Periodontal Regeneration — Furcation Defects: Practical Applications From the AAP Regeneration Workshop

Focused Clinical Question: How should periodontal furcation defects be managed via periodontal regenerative therapy, and what parameters should be used for treatment selection? Summary: The treatment of furcation defects can vary based on the type and location of the furcation involvement. Attaining...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical advances in periodontics 2015-02, Vol.5 (1), p.30-39
Main Authors: Aichelmann‐Reidy, Mary E., Avila‐Ortiz, Gustavo, Klokkevold, Perry R., Murphy, Kevin G., Rosen, Paul S., Schallhorn, Robert G., Sculean, Anton, Wang, Hom‐Lay, Reddy, Michael S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Dentistry
Evidence‐based dentistry
furcation defects
guided tissue regeneration
periodontal diseases
reconstructive surgical procedures
regeneration
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Focused Clinical Question: How should periodontal furcation defects be managed via periodontal regenerative therapy, and what parameters should be used for treatment selection? Summary: The treatment of furcation defects can vary based on the type and location of the furcation involvement. Attaining predictable regenerative outcomes is dependent on the control of local and systemic factors. A combined treatment approach (barrier and bone replacement graft with or without biologic) generally offers the better therapeutic outcome over monotherapy. Class I furcation defects can be managed via conventional periodontal non‐surgical and/or surgical therapy, whereas Class II furcation defects generally attain better outcomes with regenerative therapy. There is weak evidence, limited to case reports, that Class III furcation defects can be treated successfully with regenerative therapy. Conclusions: In Class I furcation defects, regenerative therapy might be beneficial in certain clinical scenarios, although most Class I furcation defects can be treated successfully with non‐regenerative therapy. For successful treatment of maxillary and mandibular molars with Class II furcation defects, systemic and local factors should be controlled, and surgical debridement and postoperative maintenance should be performed adequately. Although there is limited evidence for regeneration of Class III furcation defects, there may be a modest improvement allowing for tooth retention. Ultimately, the benefit of tooth retention and cost should be considered in the indication of therapy for teeth with severe furcation involvement.
ISSN:2573-8046
2163-0097
DOI:10.1902/cap.2015.140068