Predictive value of MCM5 (ADXBLADDER) analysis in urine of men evaluated for the initial diagnosis of bladder cancer: A comparative prospective study

Background To compare predictive value of MCM5 to urinary cytology (UC) for the primary diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). Methods We prospectively enrolled 91 patients who presented macroscopic hematuria or persistent lower urinary tract symptoms at our institution. Single voided mid‐stream urine s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diagnostic cytopathology 2020-11, Vol.48 (11), p.1034-1040
Main Authors: Anastasi, Emanuela, Maggi, Martina, Tartaglione, Sara, Angeloni, Antonio, Gennarini, Giuseppina, Leoncini, Pier Paolo, Sperduti, Isabella, Di Lascio, Giovanni, De Stefano, Virgilio, Di Pierro, Giovanni Battista, Del Giudice, Francesco, Busetto, Gian Maria, De Berardinis, Ettore, Sciarra, Alessandro
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bladder cancer
cytology
high grade urothelial carcinoma
MCM5
urinary markers
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background To compare predictive value of MCM5 to urinary cytology (UC) for the primary diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). Methods We prospectively enrolled 91 patients who presented macroscopic hematuria or persistent lower urinary tract symptoms at our institution. Single voided mid‐stream urine specimens were collected for UC and MCM5 (ADXBLADDER; Arquer Diagnostics Ltd, Sunderland, United Kingdom) assessment. Cystoscopy was used as confirmatory test, and positive cases underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor with histopathological evaluation. Results Forty cases (43.9%) showed a positive cystoscopy for BCa. Histology was obtained in 37 cases: 16 (43.2%) high‐grade (HG) and 21 (56.8%) low‐grade (LG) transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). UC had a sensitivity of 62.5%, specificity of 86.3%, PPV of 78.1% and NPV of 74.6%. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of MCM5 were 60.0%, 88.2%, 80.0% and 73.8%, respectively. According to tumor grade, MCM5 and UC showed a sensitivity of 47.6% and 52.4% in LG, and 87.5% and 75.0%, respectively, in HG TCC. False‐positive rates were 11.8% and 13.7% of negative cases for BCa with MCM5 and UC test, whereas false‐negative results were found in 40.0% and 37.5% of BCa cases, respectively. The combination of the two tests showed a sensitivity of 71.4% in LG, and 93.8% in HG TCC. Conclusion In the present analysis, MCM5 showed lower sensitivity than UC in predicting BCa primary diagnosis. According to tumor grade, MCM5 showed a higher sensitivity in the detection of HG BCa compared to UC, although values were not significantly different.
ISSN:8755-1039
1097-0339
DOI:10.1002/dc.24530