Loading…

Impact of weight loss on cancer patients’ quality of life at the beginning of the chemotherapy

Purpose Among the prognostic factors relevant to the condition of oncological patients, nutritional status (NS) has the greatest single impact on quality of life (QL). The goals of our study were to evaluate the influence of NS, weight loss (WL), and the presence of cachexia, prior to the initiation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Supportive care in cancer 2021-02, Vol.29 (2), p.627-634
Main Authors: Álvaro Sanz, Elena, Abilés, Jimena, Garrido Siles, Margarita, Pérez Ruíz, Elísabeth, Alcaide García, Julia, Rueda Domínguez, Antonio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose Among the prognostic factors relevant to the condition of oncological patients, nutritional status (NS) has the greatest single impact on quality of life (QL). The goals of our study were to evaluate the influence of NS, weight loss (WL), and the presence of cachexia, prior to the initiation of chemotherapy, on the patient’s QL. Methods Adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with solid tumours for whom chemotherapy was started between April 2016 and June 2017 were eligible for inclusion in the study. They were asked to complete a QL questionnaire (Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment (FACT-G)) at the beginning. The presence or absence of cachexia was evaluated at the outset, following the definition proposed by Fearon and nutritional assessment by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) scale. Results A total of 177 patients completed the FACT-G, the 60% receiving curative therapy. At the start of the treatment, 58.2% of patients had experienced WL, with an average of 4.4 ± 7.4%, and 19% were at risk of malnutrition. Patient who presented cachexia at diagnosis, were treated with palliative intention, had a Nutriscore ≥ 5 points or presented malnutrition in accordance with PG-SGA had a poorer QL ( p  
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-020-05496-9