Loading…
Training and assessment of competence in resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) — a systematic review
•Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an emergency procedure that is highly suited for simulation-based training.•This systematic review reports the findings of sixteen studies of simulation-based training programs in REBOA and femoral arterial access.•All studies sup...
Saved in:
Published in: | Injury 2020-02, Vol.51 (2), p.147-156 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an emergency procedure that is highly suited for simulation-based training.•This systematic review reports the findings of sixteen studies of simulation-based training programs in REBOA and femoral arterial access.•All studies support a positive effect of simulation-based training on procedural competency, but overall study quality was low.•To advance research in REBOA training, an assessment tool for procedural competency supported by validity evidence is needed.
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a potentially life-saving but high-risk emergency procedure in patients with haemorrhagic shock. Lack of physicians with competence in the procedure is a barrier to implementation of REBOA. It is currently unclear how training and assessment of competence should be done.
To report and evaluate research in training and assessment of competence in REBOA and femoral arterial access with the aim to investigate the effect of simulation-based training in the procedure and to provide suggestions for the future design of training programs and assessment tools.
Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies on training or assessment of competence in REBOA and femoral arterial access. Bias assessment was done using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Evidence level was assessed using GRADE.
Sixteen studies were included, six of them published as abstracts. Full-text studies included 189 trainees ranging in experience level from military medics to surgical specialists. Outcome measures were heterogenous; the most used were rater checklists, knowledge testing, and procedure time. All studies confirmed an effect of training of REBOA on procedural competence in a simulation setting but had a high degree of bias. No study developed or used an assessment tool supported by validity evidence and no study investigated mid and long-term outcomes.
Simulation-based training of REBOA improves skills, however, the evidence level is very low and data cannot answer important questions on effect size, skill transfer and retention, and optimal course design. To advance research and training programmes, an assessment tool supported by validity evidence with broad applicability is needed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-1383 1879-0267 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.injury.2019.11.036 |