Loading…
Adherence with operative standards in the treatment of gastric cancer in the United States
Background Despite multiple clinical trials and practice guidelines for the treatment of gastric cancer, oncologic outcomes have not improved in the United States. One potential reason could be differences in the quality of surgery as performed in a controlled trial versus in practice. Methods Using...
Saved in:
Published in: | Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 2020-05, Vol.23 (3), p.550-560 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Despite multiple clinical trials and practice guidelines for the treatment of gastric cancer, oncologic outcomes have not improved in the United States. One potential reason could be differences in the quality of surgery as performed in a controlled trial versus in practice.
Methods
Using the National Cancer Database, rates of adherence with operative standards for gastrectomy for cancer were analyzed. Of the numerous evidence-based operative standards outlined in the manual, two were reliably measured in the NCDB: (1) achieving and R0 resection, and (2) having > 16 lymph nodes examined. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling and logistic regression were performed.
Results
A total of 28,705 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent curative-intent gastrectomy during 2004–2014 were identified. Only 36.5% of stage 0/I patients, and 41.8% of stage II/III patients, met minimum standards. Predictors for meeting standards included age |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1436-3291 1436-3305 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10120-019-01028-5 |