Reverse Bohlman technique for treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis in an adult population

•Surgical techniques for treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis remain controversial.•The reverse Bohlman approach represents a novel approach for the treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis.•Mean pre-operative anterolisthesis improved from 18.3% to 10.1%.•Slip angle improved from 60.43° to 48....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical neuroscience 2019-11, Vol.69, p.230-236
Main Authors: Jamshidi, Aria, Levi, Allan D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Bohlman
Female
High grade
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Pedicle Screws
Radiculopathy - surgery
Reverse
Spinal Fusion - methods
Spondylolisthesis
Spondylolisthesis - surgery
Treatment Outcome
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Surgical techniques for treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis remain controversial.•The reverse Bohlman approach represents a novel approach for the treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis.•Mean pre-operative anterolisthesis improved from 18.3% to 10.1%.•Slip angle improved from 60.43° to 48.71°.•First study comparing outcomes of modified Bohlman and reverse Bohlman procedure. Surgical techniques for treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) remain controversial. This study aims to evaluate both radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with HGS treated with the “modified Bohlman” and Reverse Bohlman technique. Review of consecutive HGS patients undergoing modified Bohlman and Reverse Bohlman at a single center from 2006 to 2018. Clinical, surgical, and radiographic data were collected. Six patients identified in the modified Bohlman treatment arm: and eight patients in the Reverse Bohlman group. Twelve (12) patients presented with high grade congenital spondylolisthesis at L5-S1; one patient presented with dissolution of the L5 vertebral body secondary to uncontrolled osteomyelitis that developed after a previous failed fusion; and one patient presented with iatrogenic L5-S1 spondylolisthesis after a previous L3-S1 fusion. One patient had medially placement pedicle screw and associated radiculopathy. All follow-up post = operative scans demonstrated solid fusion. Postoperatively, anterolisthesis improved from 18.3% to 10.1% (p = .0586) and the slip angle improved from 60.43° of kyphosis to 48.71° (p = .0139). No spondylolisthesis translational reduction maneuvers were attempted intraoperatively except for positioning on a sacral cushion to increase lordotic angle. Lumbar lordosis improved from 65.29 to 63.86 postoperatively. Four of our fourteen patients had long-term median follow-up of 28 months (range = 19–48 months) slip angle, percentage, and lumbar lordosis all improved from the patient’s pre-operative measurements. The improvement in slip angle was nearly statistically significant with a p-value of 0.065. Reverse Bohlman technique for high grade spondylolisthesis is a viable option when seeking to address adjacent level instability or slip.
ISSN:0967-5868
1532-2653
DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2019.07.044