Feasibility and Effectiveness of Telelactation Among Rural Breastfeeding Women

To evaluate the feasibility and impact of telelactation via personal electronic devices on breastfeeding duration and exclusivity among rural women. The Tele-MILC trial, a pragmatic, parallel design trial, recruited 203 women during their postpartum hospitalization in a critical access hospital in P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Academic pediatrics 2020-07, Vol.20 (5), p.652-659
Main Authors: Uscher-Pines, Lori, Ghosh-Dastidar, Bonnie, Bogen, Debra L., Ray, Kristin N., Demirci, Jill R., Mehrotra, Ateev, Kapinos, Kandice A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
breastfeeding
lactation
rural health
telehealth
telelactation
telemedicine
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To evaluate the feasibility and impact of telelactation via personal electronic devices on breastfeeding duration and exclusivity among rural women. The Tele-MILC trial, a pragmatic, parallel design trial, recruited 203 women during their postpartum hospitalization in a critical access hospital in Pennsylvania and randomized them to receive telelactation (n = 102) or usual care (n = 101). We used intent-to-treat (ITT) and instrumental variable (IV) approaches to analyze study data for the 187 participants who completed follow-up. The primary outcomes were any breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding at 12 weeks postpartum. Among participants in the telelactation arm, 50% (47/94) reported participating in video calls. At 12 weeks, 71% of participants in the telelactation arm versus 68% of control participants were breastfeeding in the ITT model (3% difference, P = .73), whereas 73% of participants in the telelactation arm versus 68% of control participants were breastfeeding in the IV model (5% difference, P = .74). Among participants who were still breastfeeding at 12 weeks, 51% participants in the telelactation arm were breastfeeding exclusively versus 46% of control participants in the ITT model (5% difference, P = .47), whereas 56% of participants in the telelactation arm were breastfeeding exclusively versus 45% of control participants in the IV model (11% difference, P = .48). In all models, participants in the telelactation arm were breastfeeding at higher rates; however, differences were not statistically significant. This trial demonstrated that telelactation can be implemented with a rural underserved population. Though this trial was not powered to detect differences in breastfeeding duration and exclusivity, and none were observed, telelactation remains a promising approach for further investigation. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02870413.
ISSN:1876-2859
1876-2867
DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2019.10.008