Loading…

Associations between estimated foetal weight discordance and clinical characteristics within dichorionic twins: The NICHD Fetal Growth Studies

Background Birthweight discordance is well studied, with less known about longitudinal inter‐twin differences in foetal growth. Objective To examine inter‐twin per cent differences in EFW (EFW%), head (HC%) and abdominal circumference (AC%), and femur length (FL%) across gestation in dichorionic twi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology 2019-09, Vol.33 (5), p.332-342
Main Authors: Amyx, Melissa M., Albert, Paul S., Bever, Alaina M., Hinkle, Stefanie N., Owen, John, Grobman, William A., Newman, Roger B., Chien, Edward K., Gore‐Langton, Robert E., Buck Louis, Germaine M., Grantz, Katherine L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Birthweight discordance is well studied, with less known about longitudinal inter‐twin differences in foetal growth. Objective To examine inter‐twin per cent differences in EFW (EFW%), head (HC%) and abdominal circumference (AC%), and femur length (FL%) across gestation in dichorionic twin gestations and explore associated characteristics. Methods Foetal biometrics were assessed by ultrasound and EFW calculated at ≤6 study visits among women with dichorionic twin pregnancies enrolled in the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies cohort (US, 2012‐2013). Inter‐twin per cent difference was defined: ([Sizelarger twin − Sizesmaller twin]/Sizelarger twin × 100). Linear mixed models evaluated per cent differences in foetal biometrics at 15 weeks and their change per week overall and by maternal/neonatal characteristics in unadjusted and adjusted models. Results In 140 pregnancies, inter‐twin per cent differences increased across gestation for EFW (0.18%/week, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10, 0.27), HC (0.03%/week, 95% CI 0.00, 0.06), and AC (0.03%/week, 95%CI −0.01, 0.08) but decreased for FL (−0.03%/week, 95% CI −0.09, 0.02). After adjustment, change in EFW% difference across gestation differed by pre‐pregnancy body mass index (BMI [kg/m2]; underweight [
ISSN:0269-5022
1365-3016
DOI:10.1111/ppe.12570