Loading…

Upadacitinib Versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results of a Phase III, Double‐Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective To evaluate the efficacy, including capacity for inhibition of radiographic progression, and safety of upadacitinib, a JAK1‐selective inhibitor, as compared to placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have experienced an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) N.J.), 2019-11, Vol.71 (11), p.1788-1800
Main Authors: Fleischmann, Roy, Pangan, Aileen L., Song, In‐Ho, Mysler, Eduardo, Bessette, Louis, Peterfy, Charles, Durez, Patrick, Ostor, Andrew J., Li, Yihan, Zhou, Yijie, Othman, Ahmed A., Genovese, Mark C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To evaluate the efficacy, including capacity for inhibition of radiographic progression, and safety of upadacitinib, a JAK1‐selective inhibitor, as compared to placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have experienced an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Methods In total, 1,629 RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX were randomized (2:2:1) to receive upadacitinib (15 mg once daily), placebo, or adalimumab (40 mg every other week) while continuing to take a stable background dose of MTX. The primary end points were achievement of an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) improvement response and a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C‐reactive protein level (DAS28‐CRP) of
ISSN:2326-5191
2326-5205
DOI:10.1002/art.41032