Loading…
Evidence that within-dimension features are generally processed coactively
In this paper, we examine whether information about an item’s category, provided by the same dimension type presented across multiple spatial locations (which we term within-dimension features), is processed independently or pooled into a common representation. We use Systems Factorial Technology (S...
Saved in:
Published in: | Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2020, Vol.82 (1), p.193-227 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In this paper, we examine whether information about an item’s category, provided by the same dimension type presented across multiple spatial locations (which we term
within-dimension
features), is processed independently or pooled into a common representation. We use Systems Factorial Technology (SFT; Townsend & Nozawa,
Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39
, 321–340,
1995
) and fit parametric logical rule-based models to diagnose whether information processing is serial, parallel, or coactive. The present work focuses on expanding the scope of categorization response time (RT) models by synthesizing recent work in perceptual categorization with theories of visual attention. Our results show that for the majority of participants, processing occurs coactively (i.e., is pooled into a single decision process). For the remainder, other processing strategies were found (e.g., parallel processing). This finding provides new insight into decision-making using within-dimension features presented in multiple locations. It also highlights the importance of both featural information and spatial attention in categorization decision-making. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1943-3921 1943-393X |
DOI: | 10.3758/s13414-019-01775-8 |