Loading…

Clinical significance of common-stem lenticulostriate arteries in patients with internal watershed infarction

Background A common-stem origin of lenticulostriate arteries (CS-LSAs) is an anatomical variation that supplies a moderate to large section of the basal ganglia. We hypothesized that CS-LSAs with a patent orifice are located at distal positions of the acute-occluded middle cerebral artery (MCA) and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurological sciences 2019-11, Vol.40 (11), p.2303-2309
Main Authors: Chen, Wen -huo, Yi, Ting-yu, Zhan, A-lai, Wu, Yan-min, Zhang, Mei-fang, Li, Yi-min, Lu, Yan-yu, Lin, Ding-lai, Lin, Xiao-hui, Pan, Zhi-nan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background A common-stem origin of lenticulostriate arteries (CS-LSAs) is an anatomical variation that supplies a moderate to large section of the basal ganglia. We hypothesized that CS-LSAs with a patent orifice are located at distal positions of the acute-occluded middle cerebral artery (MCA) and that the blood flow of CS-LSAs is supplied by pail arterial anastomoses and results in hypoperfusion of CS-LSAs, similar to a deep watershed (DWS) infarction. Objective Our study evaluated the possibility of CS-LSAs in patients with DWS infarction and MCA occlusion and also assessed the safety of endovascular therapy (ET) in these patients. Methods A cohort of consecutive patients with DWS infarction and MCA occlusion and in whom full recanalization via ET was achieved were identified. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of CS-LSAs observed during ET. In addition, radiological and clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Results Thirty-three patients were included, and CS-LSAs were observed in 48.5% (16/33) of patients. The possibility (72.2%, 13/18) of CS-LSAs was high in patients with DWS infarction companied with basal ganglia infarction. A good clinical outcome was similar in patients with CS-LSAs and basal ganglia infarction and in patients without CS-LSAs and basal ganglia infarction (69.2% vs. 81.8%, P  = 0.649). Conclusions The possibility of CS-LSAs was 48.5% in patients with DWS infarction and MCA occlusion, and the revascularization procedure was safe and feasible in these patients despite the moderate-to-large basal ganglia infarction.
ISSN:1590-1874
1590-3478
DOI:10.1007/s10072-019-03953-w