Network analysis of a stakeholder community combatting illegal wildlife trade

The illegal wildlife trade has emerged as a growing and urgent environmental issue. Stakeholders involved in the efforts to curb wildlife trafficking include nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), academia, and state government and enforcement bodies. The extent to which these stakeholders work and c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Conservation biology 2019-12, Vol.33 (6), p.1307-1317
Main Authors: Moshier, Andrea, Steadman, Janna, Roberts, David L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
academic
académicos
Animals
Animals, Wild
análisis de redes sociales
aplicación
Biological competition
centralidad de redes
Communication
Communication networks
community
Competition
comunidad
Confidentiality
Conservation of Natural Resources
Enforcement
Ethics
Fauna
Humans
Mathematical analysis
Network analysis
network centrality
NGO
NGOs
Nongovernmental organizations
ONG
Organizations
social network analysis
Social networks
Social organization
Stakeholders
Trade
Trafficking
United Kingdom
Wildlife
Wildlife trade
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The illegal wildlife trade has emerged as a growing and urgent environmental issue. Stakeholders involved in the efforts to curb wildlife trafficking include nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), academia, and state government and enforcement bodies. The extent to which these stakeholders work and communicate among each other is fundamental to effectively combatting illicit trade. Using the United Kingdom as a case study, we used a social network analysis and semistructured interviews of stakeholders to assess communication relationships in the counter wildlife trafficking community. The NGOs consistently occupied 4 of the 5 most central positions in the generated networks, whereas academic institutions routinely occupied 4 of the 5 most peripheral positions. However, NGOs were the least diverse in their communication practices compared with the other stakeholder groups. Stakeholders identified personal relationships as the most important aspect of functioning communication. Participant insights also showed that stakeholder‐specific variables (e.g., ethical and confidentiality concerns), competition, and fundraising can have a confounding effect on intercommunication. Evaluating communication networks and intrastakeholder communication trends is essential to creating cohesive, productive, and efficient responses to the challenges of combatting illegal wildlife trade. Article impact statement: Communication among those combatting illegal wildlife trade is confounded by stakeholder variables (ethics, confidentiality), competition, and fundraising. Análisis de las Redes de una Comunidad de Activistas que Combate al Mercado Ilegal de Fauna Resumen El mercado ilegal de fauna ha emergido como un tema ambiental creciente y urgente. Los actores involucrados en los esfuerzos por detener el tráfico de fauna incluyen a las organizaciones no gubernamentales (ONGs), los académicos y a los cuerpos estatales de gobierno y aplicación de la ley. El grado hasta el que estos accionistas trabajen y se comuniquen entre sí es fundamental para combatir efectivamente el mercado ilícito. Con el Reino Unido como estudio de caso, usamos un análisis de redes sociales y entrevistas semiestructuradas con los actores para evaluar las relaciones de comunicación dentro de la comunidad que combate el tráfico de fauna. Las ONGs ocuparon sistemáticamente cuatro de las cinco posiciones más centrales en las redes generadas, mientras que las instituciones académicas ocuparon rutinariamente cuat
ISSN:0888-8892
1523-1739
DOI:10.1111/cobi.13336