Transfer Learning Effects of Biofeedback Running Retraining in Untrained Conditions

PURPOSERunning gait retraining via peak tibial shock biofeedback has been previously shown to reduce impact loading and mitigate running-related symptoms. In previous research, peak tibial shock is typically measured and trained for one limb at a single constant training speed during all training se...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2019-09, Vol.51 (9), p.1904-1908
Main Authors: ZHANG, JANET HANWEN, CHAN, ZOE YAU-SHAN, AU, IVAN PUI-HUNG, AN, WINKO WENKANG, SHULL, PETER BRADLEY, CHEUNG, ROY TSZ-HEI
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accelerometry - instrumentation
Adult
Biofeedback, Psychology
Female
Gait - physiology
Humans
Leg - physiology
Male
Physical Conditioning, Human - methods
Running - physiology
Running - psychology
Stress, Mechanical
Tibia - physiology
Transfer, Psychology
Wearable Electronic Devices
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:PURPOSERunning gait retraining via peak tibial shock biofeedback has been previously shown to reduce impact loading and mitigate running-related symptoms. In previous research, peak tibial shock is typically measured and trained for one limb at a single constant training speed during all training sessions. The goal of this study was to determine how runners transfer learning in the trained limb to the untrained limb at different unconstrained speeds. METHODSThirteen runners (3 females, age = 41.1 ± 6.9 yr, running experience = 6.8 ± 4.4 yr, weekly running distance = 30.7 ± 22.2 km) underwent running gait biofeedback retraining via continuous tibial acceleration measured at the right distal tibia. Before and after the training, participants were asked to run at their self-selected constrained training speeds (2.8 ± 0.2 m·s) and at 110% and 90% of the training speed. Pretraining and posttraining peak tibial shock values for each limb were compared. RESULTSParticipants reduced peak tibial shock in the trained limb by 35% to 37% (P < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.78–0.85), and in the untrained limb by 20% to 23% (P < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.51–0.71) across the three testing speeds. The reduction was not significantly different between the trained and untrained limbs (P = 0.31–0.79, Cohen’s d = 0.18–0.45). Similarly, there was no difference in peak tibial shock reduction among the three running speeds (P = 0.48–0.61, Cohen’s d = 0.06–0.45). CONCLUSIONParticipants demonstrated transfer learning effects evidenced by concomitant reduced peak tibial shock in the untrained limb, and the learning effects were retrained when running at a 10% variance of the training speed.
ISSN:0195-9131
1530-0315
DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000002007