The permanence of friction ridge skin and persistence of friction ridge skin and impressions: A comprehensive review and new results
[Display omitted] •Permanence is the unchanging appearance of friction ridge detail.•Persistence offers sufficient similarity for operationally relevant identifications.•Level 1 details were permanent; level 2 was persistent but not permanent.•Most level 3 details were neither permanent nor persiste...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Forensic science international 2019-04, Vol.297, p.111-131 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | eng |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | [Display omitted]
•Permanence is the unchanging appearance of friction ridge detail.•Persistence offers sufficient similarity for operationally relevant identifications.•Level 1 details were permanent; level 2 was persistent but not permanent.•Most level 3 details were neither permanent nor persistent.•The presumption of persistence was upheld.
This study addresses the permanence and persistence of friction ridges and the persistence of impressions made from these friction ridges over months and years. Permanence is the unchanging presence and appearance of friction ridge arrangements and their attributes between recurring observations of the skin. Permanence was evaluated from direct photographs of fingers collected over a period of 30–45 days (covering one or more skin regeneration cycles) as well as after 8 or more years had elapsed. Persistence embodies the operational concept of whether or not a pair of images displays sufficient similarity upon which to base an informed decision that they were made by the same finger, while acknowledging certain dissimilarities or distortions due to friction ridge physiology, image capture, matrix, substrate, and applied pressure. Persistence applies to both friction ridge skin and impressions made from these friction ridges. Permanence and persistence of skin were assessed from direct photographs of fingers taken two months apart and from finger photographs separated by an interval of at least 8 years. Permanence and persistence were also assessed from impressions taken over 4 months, as well as those separated by 8–53 years. Variability due to capture method was assessed by using four image capture methods over a four month period: direct photography of fingers, impressions captured by ink, holographic imaging, and live scan. Qualified latent fingerprint examiners assessed all changes observed over time, as well as any limitations imposed by capture method.
The practice of comparison and identification of fingerprint impressions was upheld, as was the prevailing use of the word persistence to describe stability of friction ridges. All photographs and impressions of the same finger were identifiable as originating from the same source. Within all the periods of observation, level 1 detail was permanent and persistent. Persistence, but not permanence, was supported for level 2 detail. Notably, the small changes observed were only in appearance; there were no changes in the presence of new, or absence of existing, min |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0379-0738 1872-6283 |