Loading…
Quantitative assessment of mesorectal fat: new prognostic biomarker in patients with mid-to-lower rectal cancer
Objectives To investigate the impact of mesorectal fat area (MFA) on oncologic outcomes in patients with mid-to-lower rectal cancer who received curative-intent surgery. Methods Patients with mid-to-lower rectal cancer who underwent preoperative abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) and curative-i...
Saved in:
Published in: | European radiology 2019-03, Vol.29 (3), p.1240-1247 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objectives
To investigate the impact of mesorectal fat area (MFA) on oncologic outcomes in patients with mid-to-lower rectal cancer who received curative-intent surgery.
Methods
Patients with mid-to-lower rectal cancer who underwent preoperative abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) and curative-intent surgery in 2011 were divided into two groups by tumour recurrence (group A) or no recurrence (group B) during a 5-year follow-up. Visceral fat area (VFA) and MFA were measured on preoperative CT and cutoff values were calculated using the Youden index. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses including BMI, VFA, and MFA were performed to investigate meaningful prognostic biomarkers. The Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank testing was used to validate prognostic biomarkers.
Results
Group A contained 42 patients and group B had 155 patients. Cutoff values were 25 kg/m
2
for BMI, 130 cm
2
for VFA, and 10 cm
2
for MFA using the Youden index. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, MFA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.426,
p
= 0.010), TNM stage (
p
= 0.027), and perioperative complication grade (
p
= 0.028) were significantly different between groups. BMI and VFA did not show significant differences. By the Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank testing, disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly longer in patients with MFA ≥10 cm
2
compared to patients with MFA |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00330-018-5723-5 |