Loading…

Three-dimensional tumor visualization of invasive breast carcinomas using whole-mount serial section histopathology: implications for tumor size assessment

Purpose Linear tumor size (T-size) estimated with conventional histology informs breast cancer management. Previously we demonstrated significant differences in margin and focality estimates using conventional histology versus digital whole-mount serial sections (WMSS). Using WMSS we can measure T-s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2019-04, Vol.174 (3), p.669-677
Main Authors: Clarke, G. M., Holloway, C. M. B., Zubovits, J. T., Nofech-Mozes, S., Murray, M., Liu, K., Wang, D., Kiss, A., Yaffe, M. J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose Linear tumor size (T-size) estimated with conventional histology informs breast cancer management. Previously we demonstrated significant differences in margin and focality estimates using conventional histology versus digital whole-mount serial sections (WMSS). Using WMSS we can measure T-size or volume. Here, we compare WMSS T-size with volume, and with T-size measured conventionally. We also compare the ellipsoid model for calculating tumor volume to direct, WMSS measurement. Methods Two pathologists contoured regions of invasive carcinoma and measured T-size from both WMSS and (simulated) conventional sections in 55 consecutive lumpectomy specimens. Volume was measured directly from the contours. Measurements were compared using the paired t -test or Spearman’s rank-order correlation. A five-point ‘border index’ was devised and assigned to each case to parametrize tumor shape considering ‘compactness’ or cellularity. Tumor volumes calculated assuming ellipsoid geometry were compared with direct, WMSS measurements. Results WMSS reported significantly larger T-size than conventional histology in the majority of cases [61.8%, 34/55; means = (2.34 cm; 1.99 cm), p  
ISSN:0167-6806
1573-7217
DOI:10.1007/s10549-018-05122-7