Outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction secondary to reamer-irrigator-aspirator harvested bone grafting

•RIA harvested bone grafting ensures sufficient tunnel filling rates in two-staged revision ACL surgery.•RIA harvested bone grafting allows for anatomical tunnel positioning in two-staged revision ACL reconstruction.•This study is the first to show good subjective and objective clinical outcomes aft...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Injury 2019-02, Vol.50 (2), p.467-475
Main Authors: Prall, W.C., Kusmenkov, T., Fürmetz, J., Haasters, F., Mayr, H.O., Böcker, W., Grote, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anterior cruciate ligament
Bone grafting
Outcome
Reamer-irrigator-aspirator
Revision ACL reconstruction
RIA
Tunnel positioning
Two-staged
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•RIA harvested bone grafting ensures sufficient tunnel filling rates in two-staged revision ACL surgery.•RIA harvested bone grafting allows for anatomical tunnel positioning in two-staged revision ACL reconstruction.•This study is the first to show good subjective and objective clinical outcomes after revision ACL secondary to RIA harvested bone grafting.•RIA harvested bone grafting is shown to be an eligible alternative to autologous iliac crest bone grafting and allogenic bone grafting. Patients with widened or misplaced tunnels may require bone grafting prior to revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Utilising reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) harvested bone from the femur showed promising filling rates. Nevertheless, the procedure has neither been validated in a larger population nor been assessed with regards to radiological and clinical outcome of the subsequently conducted revision ACL reconstruction. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate tunnel filling rates, positioning of the revision tunnels and outcome parameters of such two-staged revision ACL reconstructions. A total of 15 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled in this case series. CT scans were analysed before and after autologous RIA harvested bone grafting. Tunnel volumes and filling rates were calculated based on manual segmentation of axial CT scans. Revision ACL reconstruction was carried out after a mean interval of 6.2 months (±3.7) and positioning of the revision tunnels was assessed by plane radiographs. The mean follow-up was 19.8 months (±8.4) for objective evaluation and 37.1 months (±15.4) for patient reported outcomes. The clinical outcome was assessed by the quantification of the anterior tibial translation, the IKDC objective score, the Tegner activity scale and the Lysholm score. Initial CT scans revealed mean tunnel volumes of 3.8cm3 (±2.7) femoral and 6.1cm3 (±2.4) tibial. Filling rates of 76.1% (±12.4) femoral and 87.4% (±5.9) tibial were achieved. Postoperative radiographs revealed significantly improved tunnel positioning with anatomical placement in all but one case at the femur and in all cases at the tibia. At follow up, patients showed significantly improved anterior tibial translations with residual side-to-side differences of 1.7 mm (±0.8) and significantly improved IKDC objective scores. Furthermore, significantly higher values were achieved on the Tegner activity scale (5.3 ± 1.4 vs. 2.8 ± 0.5) and the Lysholm score (85.4 ±
ISSN:0020-1383
1879-0267
DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2018.12.020