“Full Stomach” Despite the Wait: Point‐of‐care Gastric Ultrasound at the Time of Procedural Sedation in the Pediatric Emergency Department

Objectives The objective was to use gastric point‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) to assess gastric contents and volume, summarize the prevalence of “full stomach,” and explore the relationship between fasting time and gastric contents at the time of procedural sedation. Methods This was a prospective st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Academic emergency medicine 2019-07, Vol.26 (7), p.752-760
Main Authors: Leviter, Julie, Steele, Dale W., Constantine, Erika, Linakis, James G., Amanullah, Siraj, Macy, Michelle L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anesthesia
Anesthesiology - methods
Child
Child, Preschool
Emergency medical care
Emergency Service, Hospital
Fasting
Female
Gastrointestinal Contents - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Male
Pediatrics
Point-of-Care Systems
Preoperative Period
Prospective Studies
Pyloric Antrum - diagnostic imaging
Risk Assessment
Stomach
Time Factors
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography - methods
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives The objective was to use gastric point‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) to assess gastric contents and volume, summarize the prevalence of “full stomach,” and explore the relationship between fasting time and gastric contents at the time of procedural sedation. Methods This was a prospective study of patients aged 2 to 17 years fasting prior to procedural sedation. A single sonographer scanned each patient's gastric antrum in two positions: supine with the upper body elevated and right lateral decubitus (RLD). Gastric content (empty, liquid, or solid) was noted, and the gastric volume (mL/kg) was estimated from antral cross‐sectional area (CSA). “Full stomach” was defined as any solid content or >1.2 mL/kg of liquid gastric content. Results We enrolled 116 subjects, with a median fasting time of 5.8 hours. Of the 107 with evaluable images, 74 patients, 69% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 60%–77%), were categorized as having a full stomach. Each hour of fasting was associated with lower odds (odds ratio = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.65–0) of a full stomach. However, the knowledge of fasting time alone provides little ability to discriminate between risk groups (C‐index = 0.66). Conclusions Gastric POCUS classified many patients as having a full stomach at the time of expected procedural sedation, despite prolonged fasting times. These findings may inform risk–benefit considerations when planning the timing and medication choice for procedural sedation.
ISSN:1069-6563
1553-2712
DOI:10.1111/acem.13651