Effect of Enhanced Nutrition on Mule Deer Population Rate of Change

Concerns over declining mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) populations during the 1990s prompted research efforts to identify and understand key limiting factors of deer. Similar to past deer declines, a top priority of state wildlife agencies was to evaluate the relative importance of habitat and pred...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Wildlife monographs 2009-07, Vol.172 (1), p.1-28
Main Authors:	Bishop, Chad J, White, Gary C, Freddy, David J, Watkins, Bruce E, Stephenson, Thomas R
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Colorado compensatory mortality Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Demecology fecundity food limitation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology habitat quality lambda life table response experiment Mammalia mule deer nutrition Odocoileus hemionus Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking predation survival Vertebrata
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Concerns over declining mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) populations during the 1990s prompted research efforts to identify and understand key limiting factors of deer. Similar to past deer declines, a top priority of state wildlife agencies was to evaluate the relative importance of habitat and predation. We therefore evaluated the effect of enhanced nutrition of deer during winter and spring on fecundity and survival rates using a life table response experiment involving free-ranging mule deer on the Uncompahgre Plateau in southwest Colorado, USA. The treatment represented an instantaneous increase in nutritional carrying capacity of a pinyon (Pinus edulis)−Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) winter range and was intended to simulate optimum habitat quality. Prior studies on the Uncompahgre Plateau indicated predation and disease were the most common proximate causes of deer mortality. By manipulating nutrition and leaving natural predation unaltered, we determined whether habitat quality was ultimately a critical factor limiting the deer population. We measured annual survival and fecundity of adult females and survival of fawns, then estimated population rate of change as a function of enhanced nutrition. Pregnancy and fetal rates of adult females were high and did not vary in response to treatment. Fetal and neonatal survival rates increased in response to treatment, although the treatment effect on neonatal survival was marginal. Overwinter rates of fawn survival increased for treatment deer by 0.16−0.31 depending on year and fawn sex, and none of the 95% confidence intervals associated with the effects overlapped zero. Overwinter rates of fawn survival averaged 0.905 (SE = 0.026) for treatment deer and 0.684 (SE = 0.044) for control deer. Nutritional enhancement increased survival rates of fetuses to the yearling age class by 0.14−0.20 depending on year and fawn sex; 95% confidence intervals slightly overlapped zero. When averaging estimates across sexes and years, treatment caused fetal to yearling survival to increase by 0.177 (SE = 0.082, 95% CI: 0.016−0.337). Annual survival of adult females receiving treatment (Ŝ = 0.879, SE = 0.021) was higher than survival of control adult females (Ŝ = 0.833, SE = 0.025). Our estimate of the population rate of change (λ̂) was 1.165 (SE = 0.036) for treatment deer and 1.033 (SE = 0.038) for control deer. Increased production and survival of young (i.e., fetal, neonatal, and overwinter fawn survival) accounted
ISSN:	0084-0173 1938-5455