Design and Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Spine Surgery: Initial Experience

STUDY DESIGN.A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE.The aim of this study was to describe the development of and early experience with an evidence-based enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for lumbar decompression. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.ERAS protocols...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2019-05, Vol.44 (9), p.E561-E570
Main Authors: Soffin, Ellen M, Vaishnav, Avani S, Wetmore, Douglas S, Barber, Lauren, Hill, Patrick, Gang, Catherine Himo, Beckman, James D, Albert, Todd J, Qureshi, Sheeraz A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
Back Pain - drug therapy
Diskectomy - adverse effects
Diskectomy - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Laminectomy - adverse effects
Laminectomy - statistics & numerical data
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:STUDY DESIGN.A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE.The aim of this study was to describe the development of and early experience with an evidence-based enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for lumbar decompression. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.ERAS protocols have been consistently associated with improved patient experience and outcomes, and reduced cost and length of hospital stay (LoS). Despite successes in other orthopedic subspecialties, ERAS has yet to be established in spine surgery. Here, we report the development of and initial experience with the first comprehensive ERAS pathway for MIS lumbar spine surgery. METHODS.An evidence-based review of the literature was performed to select components of the ERAS pathway. The pathway was applied to 61 consecutive patients presenting for microdiscectomy or lumbar laminotomy/laminectomy between dates. Data collection was performed by review of the electronic medical record. We evaluated compliance with individual ERAS process measures, and adherence to the overall pathway. The primary outcome was LoS. Demographics, comorbidities, perioperative course, prevalence of opioid tolerance, and factors affecting LoS were also documented. RESULTS.The protocol included 15 standard ERAS elements. Overall pathway compliance was 85.03%. Median LoS was 279 minutes [interquartile range (IQR) 195–398 minutes] overall, 298 minutes (IQR 192–811) for lumbar decompression and 285 minutes (IQR 200–372) for microdiscectomy. There was no correlation between surgical subtype or duration and LoS. Overall, 37% of the cohort was opioid-tolerant at the time of surgery. There was no significant effect of baseline opioid use on LoS, or on the total amount of intraoperative or PACU opioid administration. There were four complications (6.5%) resulting in extended LoS (>23 hours). CONCLUSION.This report comprises the first description of a comprehensive, evidence-based ERAS for spine pathway, tailored for lumbar decompression/microdiscectomy resulting in short LoS, minimal complications, and no readmissions within 90 days of surgery.Level of Evidence3
ISSN:0362-2436
1528-1159
DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002905