Clinical workflow and applicability of electrophysiological cardiovascular magnetic resonance-guided radiofrequency ablation of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter

Abstract Aims To determine safety and efficacy of electrophysiological cardiovascular magnetic resonance (EP-CMR)-guided radiofrequency (RF) ablation in patients with typical right atrial flutter in a routine clinical setting. Methods and results Thirty patients with typical right atrial flutter und...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European heart journal cardiovascular imaging 2019-02, Vol.20 (2), p.147-156
Main Authors: Paetsch, Ingo, Sommer, Philipp, Jahnke, Cosima, Hilbert, Sebastian, Loebe, Susanne, Schoene, Katharina, Oebel, Sabrina, Krueger, Sascha, Weiss, Steffen, Smink, Jouke, Lloyd, Tom, Hindricks, Gerhard
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Aims To determine safety and efficacy of electrophysiological cardiovascular magnetic resonance (EP-CMR)-guided radiofrequency (RF) ablation in patients with typical right atrial flutter in a routine clinical setting. Methods and results Thirty patients with typical right atrial flutter underwent clinically indicated EP-CMR-guided cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. EP-CMR protocols included pre- and post-ablation CMR imaging (whole heart, T2-weighted, and early-/late-gadolinium enhancement) together with electroanatomic mapping of the right atrium. Coronary sinus cannulation time and total ablation procedure duration were used as performance measures to determine the learning experience of the EP-CMR interventionalist and for comparison with conventional, fluoroscopy-guided atrial flutter ablation. Procedural safety and success rates were evaluated at 1 week and 3 months follow-up. Safety and success rates of EP-CMR were similar to conventional flutter ablations (primary success rate, 93% vs. 100%; recurrence rate, 0% vs. 3%, respectively). EP-CMR procedure duration indicated a learning experience (first vs. last six patients, 54.2 ± 23.1 vs. 29.7 ± 20.0 min) and the minimum number of procedures needed to achieve a level of competency was n = 12. An isthmus angle
ISSN:2047-2404
2047-2412
DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jey143