Loading…
Angiographic and clinical outcomes of antegrade versus retrograde techniques for chronic total occlusion revascularizations: Insights from the PRISON IV trial
Objectives Available data indicate mixed outcomes after using retrograde techniques for chronic total occlusion(CTO) recanalization, with generally higher need for repeat revascularization. Aim of this study is to analyze the angiographic and clinical outcome of patients treated with retrograde tech...
Saved in:
Published in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2019-02, Vol.93 (2), p.E81-E89 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objectives
Available data indicate mixed outcomes after using retrograde techniques for chronic total occlusion(CTO) recanalization, with generally higher need for repeat revascularization. Aim of this study is to analyze the angiographic and clinical outcome of patients treated with retrograde techniques in the PRISON‐IV trial.
Methods and Results
This is a post‐hoc sub‐analysis from the randomized PRISON‐IV trial. Briefly, 330 patients with a successfully recanalized CTO lesion were randomized 1:1 to receive either hybrid‐SES or EES. The hybrid‐SES failed to reach the non‐inferiority primary endpoint of in‐segment late lumen loss at 9‐month angiography follow‐up. In the present analysis, we divided the population according to the first technical approach, namely antegrade (n = 285) or retrograde approach (n = 45). Demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups, while angiographic features disclosed higher CTO lesion complexity in the group treated with retrograde techniques (J‐CTO score: 1.8 ± 1.1 vs 2.6 ± 1.1, respectively, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
DOI: | 10.1002/ccd.27795 |