Gender Differences in Energy Expenditure During Walking With Backpack and Double-Pack Loads

Objective: To investigate gender differences in energy expenditure during walking with backpack and double-pack loads. Background: Studies have reported that energy expenditure during walking with double-pack loads is lower compared with backpack carriage. However, the effect of gender on energy exp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human factors 2019-03, Vol.61 (2), p.203-213
Main Authors: Li, Simon S. W., Chan, Otto H. T., Ng, T. Y., Kam, L. H., Ng, C. Y., Chung, W. C., Chow, Daniel H. K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adults
Backpacks
Body weight
Design analysis
Energy
Energy expenditure
Gas analyzers
Gender aspects
Gender differences
Load distribution
Load distribution (forces)
Loads (forces)
Oxygen consumption
Sex differences
Stress concentration
Vanadium oxides
Variance analysis
Walking
Young adults
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: To investigate gender differences in energy expenditure during walking with backpack and double-pack loads. Background: Studies have reported that energy expenditure during walking with double-pack loads is lower compared with backpack carriage. However, the effect of gender on energy expenditure while walking with these two load distribution systems has not been investigated. Method: Thirty healthy young adults (15 female and 15 male participants) walked on a treadmill with backpack and double-pack loads weighing 30% of their body weight at a speed of 0.89 m/s for 10 min. The energy expenditure in terms of oxygen consumption (VO2) and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were continuously monitored using a portable gas analyzer throughout each walking exercise. A mixed-design analysis of variance model was adopted to test the effects of gender, pack, and time on VO2 and RER. Results: No time effect was observed on VO2. However, significant gender, pack, and interaction effects were observed. The lowest VO2 was found in female participants under double-pack carriage. No significant gender or pack differences existed in RER. However, RER significantly and incrementally increased in time from the 4th through 6th, 8th, and 10th min. Conclusion: This study revealed that heavy double-pack load carriage for healthy young female participants had significantly lower energy expenditure (normalized by the entire system weight, i.e., the participant’s weight plus the weight of the pack) than that of the male participants in a 10-min walking exercise. Application: The findings of this study indicated that healthy young female participants carried a heavy double-pack with less energy cost (normalized by the entire system weight, i.e., the participant’s weight plus the weight of the pack) compared with their male counterparts during a 10-min walking exercise.
ISSN:0018-7208
1547-8181
DOI:10.1177/0018720818799190