Expression of HIF-1α, HIF-2α (EPAS1), and Their Target Genes in Paraganglioma and Pheochromocytoma with VHL and SDH Mutations

Context: Activation of the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors HIF-1 and HIF-2 and a HIF-independent defect in developmental apoptosis have been implicated in the pathogenesis of pheochromocytoma (PCC) associated with VHL, SDHB, and SDHD mutations. Objective: Our objective was to compare protein...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 2006-11, Vol.91 (11), p.4593-4598
Main Authors: Pollard, Patrick J, El-Bahrawy, Mona, Poulsom, Richard, Elia, George, Killick, Pip, Kelly, Gavin, Hunt, Toby, Jeffery, Rosemary, Seedhar, Pooja, Barwell, Julian, Latif, Farida, Gleeson, Michael J, Hodgson, Shirley V, Stamp, Gordon W, Tomlinson, Ian P. M, Maher, Eamonn R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adrenals. Adrenal axis. Renin-angiotensin system (diseases)
Biological and medical sciences
Endocrinopathies
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Medical sciences
Non tumoral diseases. Target tissue resistance. Benign neoplasms
Vertebrates: endocrinology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Context: Activation of the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors HIF-1 and HIF-2 and a HIF-independent defect in developmental apoptosis have been implicated in the pathogenesis of pheochromocytoma (PCC) associated with VHL, SDHB, and SDHD mutations. Objective: Our objective was to compare protein (HIF-1α, EPAS1, SDHB, JunB, CCND1, CD34, CLU) and gene (VEGF, BNIP3) expression patterns in VHL and SDHB/D associated tumors. Results: Overexpression of HIF-2 was relatively more common in VHL than SDHB/D PCC (12 of 13 vs. 14 of 20, P = 0.02), whereas nuclear HIF-1 staining was relatively more frequent in SDHB/D PCC (19 of 20 vs. 13 of 16, P = 0.04). In addition, CCND1 and VEGF expression (HIF-2 target genes) was significantly higher in VHL than in SDHB/D PCC. These findings suggest that VHL inactivation leads to preferential HIF-2 activation and CCND1 expression as described previously in VHL-defective renal cell carcinoma cell lines but not in other cell types. These similarities between the downstream consequences of VHL inactivation and HIF dysregulation in renal cell carcinoma and PCC may explain how inactivation of the ubiquitously expressed VHL protein results in susceptibility to specific tumor types. Both VHL and SDHB/D PCC demonstrated reduced CLU and SDHB expression. SDHB PCC are associated with a high risk of malignancy, and expression of (proapototic) BNIP3 was significantly lower in SDHB than VHL PCC. Conclusion: Although inactivation of VHL and SDHB/D may disrupt similar HIF-dependent and HIF-independent signaling pathways, their effects on target gene expression are not identical, and this may explain the observed clinical differences in PCC and associated tumors seen with germline VHL and SDHB/D mutations.
ISSN:0021-972X
1945-7197
DOI:10.1210/jc.2006-0920