Utility of complete large and small subunit rRNA genes in resolving the phylogeny of the Neodermata (Platyhelminthes): implications and a review of the cercomer theory

We combined nearly complete sequences of large (LSU) and small (SSU) subunit rDNA from 32 flatworm species to estimate the phylogeny of the Platyhelminthes using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference methods. Rooted against the Catenulida, combined evidence trees offered no su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biological journal of the Linnean Society 2003-02, Vol.78 (2), p.155-171
Main Authors: LOCKYER, A. E., OLSON, P. D., LITTLEWOOD, D. T. J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Biological evolution
Catenulida
Cestoda
evolution
flatworms
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution
helminths
Ichthyophaga
Invertebrates
Kronborgia
Lecithoepitheliata
Macrostomida
Marine
Monogenea
Nemathelminthia. Plathelmintha
Neodermata
Notentera
parasites
Platyhelminthes
Polycladida
Prolecithophora
Proseriata
Revertospermata
Rhabditophora
Rhabdocoela
Systematics. Geographical distribution
Trematoda
Tricladida
Urastoma
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We combined nearly complete sequences of large (LSU) and small (SSU) subunit rDNA from 32 flatworm species to estimate the phylogeny of the Platyhelminthes using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference methods. Rooted against the Catenulida, combined evidence trees offered no support for the Revertospermata, which was also rejected by constraint analysis. Generally, nodal support was higher for groupings estimated from the combined data partitions and all methods of analysis provided congruent estimates of phylogeny. The Monogenea and Proseriata were resolved as monophyletic, rejecting previous suggestions of paraphyly based on SSU and partial LSU data sets and thus supporting widely accepted morphological synapomorphies. Monophyly of the Neodermata was supported and its sister group was a clade of neoophoran ‘turbellarians’ to the exclusion of the Proseriata which in turn was more basal. Taxa with similar spermatology to the Neodermata (Ichthyophaga, Notentera, Urastoma and Kronborgia) were the sister group to Tricladida + Prolecithophora, which in turn were sister to the Rhabdocoela. Polycladida + Macrostomida + Lecithoepitheliata was the earliest divergent offshoot of the Rhabditophora. Among the Neodermata, the Cercomeromorphae (Cestoda + Monogenea) was not supported, whereas Cestoda + Trematoda was well supported. Although there is no known synapomorphy for this latter grouping, our data highlight problems associated with the ‘cercomer theory’ and we reject putative homologies regarding neodermatan ‘cercomers’ that have been sustained in the literature without careful scrutiny. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 78, 155–171.
ISSN:0024-4066
1095-8312
DOI:10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00141.x