Depletion of spotted and spinner dolphins in the eastern tropical Pacific: modeling hypotheses for their lack of recovery

We assess the status of 2 dolphin stocks affected by purse-seine fishing in the eastern topical Pacific and evaluate hypotheses for their lack of recovery. We use Bayesian methods and fit generalized models of logistic population growth to abundance estimates for northeastern offshore spotted dolphi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 2007-08, Vol.343, p.1-14
Main Authors: Wade, Paul R., Watters, George M., Gerrodette, Tim, Reilly, Stephen B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cetacea
Dolphins
Ecosystem models
Ecosystems
FEATURE ARTICLE
Fisheries science
Marine
Mortality
Ocean fisheries
Parametric models
Population estimates
Stenella attenuata attenuata
Stenella longirostris
Transcriptional regulatory elements
Tuna
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We assess the status of 2 dolphin stocks affected by purse-seine fishing in the eastern topical Pacific and evaluate hypotheses for their lack of recovery. We use Bayesian methods and fit generalized models of logistic population growth to abundance estimates for northeastern offshore spotted dolphinsStenella attenuata attenuataand eastern spinner dolphinsStenella longirostris orientalis. In 2002, using the definition of depletion stipulated in the USA Marine Mammal Protection Act, northeastern offshore spotted dolphins were almost certainly ‘depleted’. There is, however, uncertainty in the degree to which the stock was depleted. Eastern spinner dolphins were most likely depleted in 2002, but there is a small probability that this was not the case. Uncertainty in the degree to which both stocks were depleted stems from uncertainties in maximum net productivity levels and carrying capacities. Based on abundance data from 1979 to 2000, both stocks were estimated to have had maximum growth rates of 77% probability, lower than the accepted minimum default value for dolphin populations with reproductive parameters (e.g. calving intervals) like those considered here (Reilly & Barlow 1986, Fish Bull 84:527–533; Wade 1998, Mar Mamm Sci 14:1–37). We fit models that are intended to be indicative of hypotheses that explain why neither dolphin stock has recovered. Our data and prior information provide equal posterior support to hypotheses which attribute the lack of recovery to the fishery and changes in the ecosystem. We conclude that (1) the purse-seine fishery can impact dolphin stocks beyond the impacts of observed fishery mortality, (2) there is uncertainty about the degrees to which such cryptic impacts have population-level consequences, and (3) the existing dolphin-safe labeling standard is, from a conservation perspective, robust to this uncertainty.
ISSN:0171-8630
1616-1599
DOI:10.3354/meps07069