Loading…

Multi-institutional Survival Analysis of Incidental Pathologic T3a Upstaging in Clinical T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma Following Partial Nephrectomy

To evaluate whether incidental pathologic T3a (pT3a) upstaging after partial nephrectomy (PN) for clinical T1 disease results in inferior oncologic outcomes compared to pT1a-b disease. Retrospective chart review was completed at the University of Michigan and Moffitt Cancer Center to identify patien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2018-07, Vol.117, p.95-100
Main Authors: Russell, Christopher M., Lebastchi, Amir H., Chipollini, Juan, Niemann, Adam, Mehra, Rohit, Morgan, Todd M., Miller, David C., Palapattu, Ganesh S., Hafez, Khaled S., Sexton, Wade J., Spiess, Philippe E., Weizer, Alon Z.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To evaluate whether incidental pathologic T3a (pT3a) upstaging after partial nephrectomy (PN) for clinical T1 disease results in inferior oncologic outcomes compared to pT1a-b disease. Retrospective chart review was completed at the University of Michigan and Moffitt Cancer Center to identify patients undergoing PN for clinical T1 masses between 1995 and 2015. A total of 1955 patients were identified, of which 95 had pT3a upstaging. Median follow-up was 38.2 months. Patients with pT3a disease were individually matched by clinicopathologic features with patients undergoing PN with pT1a-b disease in a 1:2 ratio. Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were performed. Primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and rates of local and distant recurrence. Recurrence rates were significantly higher in pT3a disease compared to pT1a-b controls (P 
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2018.04.002