The Role of Semantic Representations in Verbal Working Memory

Two main mechanisms, articulatory rehearsal and attentional refreshing, are argued to be involved in the maintenance of verbal information in working memory (WM). Whereas converging research has suggested that rehearsal promotes the phonological representations of memoranda in working memory, little...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2018-06, Vol.44 (6), p.863-881
Main Authors:	Loaiza, Vanessa M., Camos, Valérie
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Articulation (Speech) Associative Learning Attention Cognition & reasoning Cognitive Ability College Students Cues Drills (Practice) Female Foreign Countries Human Language Processing Long Term Memory Male Memory Phonology Practice Prediction Recall (Psychology) Role Scoring Semantics Short Term Memory Statistical Analysis Task Analysis Test Construction Verbal Communication
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Two main mechanisms, articulatory rehearsal and attentional refreshing, are argued to be involved in the maintenance of verbal information in working memory (WM). Whereas converging research has suggested that rehearsal promotes the phonological representations of memoranda in working memory, little is known about the representations that refreshing may promote. Not only would examining this question address this gap in the literature, but the investigation has profound implications for different theoretical proposals of how refreshing functions and on the relationships between WM and long-term memory (LTM). Accordingly, we tested predictions from 5 models regarding how refreshing may moderate the semantic representation of memoranda in verbal WM. This series of 4 experiments presented a cue word that was either semantically or phonologically related to a target during the recall phase of a complex span task. Experiment 1 established the benefit of semantic over phonological retrieval cues, and Experiment 2 established that this semantic benefit was specific to a refreshing-rather than a rehearsal-based maintenance strategy. Finally, we showed that this semantic benefit did not vary with the cognitive load of the concurrent task (Experiments 3 and 4) or the intention to learn the memoranda (Experiment 4). These results indicate that cue-based retrieval from episodic LTM may strongly contribute to semantic processing effects in WM recall, but this influence of episodic LTM is independent of the function of refreshing to reactivate memory traces. Accordingly, these results have strong implications for the functioning of refreshing and the links between WM and LTM.
ISSN:	0278-7393 1939-1285