Do surrogates describe patterns in marine macroalgal diversity in the Recherche Archipelago, temperate Australia?

1. Surrogates aim to predict species diversity and to minimize sampling effort. Here the value of surrogates for marine macroalgae is tested. 2. Higher taxonomic levels and dominant taxa were evaluated as surrogates for detecting patterns in macroalgal species diversity (derived from species‐level b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aquatic conservation 2006-05, Vol.16 (3), p.313-327
Main Authors: Goldberg, Nisse A., Kendrick, Gary A., Walker, Diana I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alariaceae
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
archipelago
Australia
biodiversity
Biological and medical sciences
Ceramiales
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Dictyotales
Fucales
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Gigartinales
Laminariales
Marine
Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking
richness
subtidal macroalgae
surrogates
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:1. Surrogates aim to predict species diversity and to minimize sampling effort. Here the value of surrogates for marine macroalgae is tested. 2. Higher taxonomic levels and dominant taxa were evaluated as surrogates for detecting patterns in macroalgal species diversity (derived from species‐level biomass data) in the Recherche Archipelago, Western Australia. 3. Data were stratified by two island groups (inshore and offshore), three depth intervals (20 m), and two exposures to wave energy. Correlations between similarity matrices from surrogate and species diversity data matrices were analysed using a modified Spearman rank correlation (rs). The ability of surrogates to detect differences between exposures to wave energy was also investigated using analysis of similarity. Species diversity data were aggregated to higher taxonomic levels and were either fourth‐root or presence/absence (richness) transformed. 4. Species richness was the most consistent surrogate (rs‐values>0.69, P=0.001). Genus‐level richness was also strongly correlated to species diversity in the Recherche Archipelago, except in depths 20 m, family‐ and order‐level biomass data were suitable surrogates owing to the abundance of Alariaceae (Order Laminariales) represented by a single genus and species. Surrogates using biomass data from the orders Laminariales, Ceramiales, Dictyotales and Fucales were also successful at offshore islands in middle to deeper depths. 6. At inshore islands in depths 10–20 m and >20 m, genera from the orders Gigartinales, Fucales and Ceramiales were strongly correlated to species biomass data. 7. Surrogates, like species richness, that were strongly correlated to species biomass data were also able to distinguish between exposures to wave energy, based on analysis of similarity tests. 8. Sampling effort would be reduced if collecting richness data in species‐rich macroalgal assemblages such as those found in temperate Australia. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN:1052-7613
1099-0755
DOI:10.1002/aqc.729