Thermal behavior remains engaged following exercise despite autonomic thermoeffector withdrawal

We tested the hypothesis that thermal behavior during the exercise recovery compensates for elevated core temperatures despite autonomic thermoeffector withdrawal. In a thermoneutral environment, 6 females and 6 males (22 ± 1 y) cycled for 60 min (225 ± 46 W metabolic heat production), followed by 6...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physiology & behavior 2018-05, Vol.188, p.94-102
Main Authors: Vargas, Nicole T., Chapman, Christopher L., Sackett, James R., Abdul-Rashed, Jabril, McBryde, Muhamed, Johnson, Blair D., Gathercole, Rob, Schlader, Zachary J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Recovery
Thermal comfort
Thermoregulation
Thermoregulatory behavior
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We tested the hypothesis that thermal behavior during the exercise recovery compensates for elevated core temperatures despite autonomic thermoeffector withdrawal. In a thermoneutral environment, 6 females and 6 males (22 ± 1 y) cycled for 60 min (225 ± 46 W metabolic heat production), followed by 60 min passive recovery. Mean skin and core temperatures, skin blood flow, and local sweat rate were measured continually. Subjects controlled the temperature of their dorsal neck to perceived thermal comfort using a custom-made neck device. Neck device temperature provided an index of thermal behavior. Mean body temperature, calculated as the average of mean skin and core temperatures, provided an index of the stimulus for thermal behavior. To isolate the independent effect of exercise on thermal behavior during recovery, data were analyzed post-exercise the exact minute mean body temperature recovered to pre-exercise levels within a subject. Mean body temperature returned to pre-exercise levels 28 ± 20 min into recovery (Pre: 33.5 ± 0.2, Post: 33.5 ± 0.2 °C, P = 0.20), at which point, mean skin temperature had recovered (Pre: 29.6 ± 0.4, Post: 29.5 ± 0.5 °C, P = 0.20) and core temperature (Pre: 37.3 ± 0.2, Post: 37.5 ± 0.3 °C, P = 0.01) remained elevated. Post-exercise, skin blood flow (Pre: 59 ± 78, Post: 26 ± 25 PU, P = 0.10) and local sweat rate (Pre: 0.05 ± 0.25, Post: 0.13 ± 0.14 mg/cm2 min−1, P = 0.09) returned to pre-exercise levels, while neck device temperature was depressed (Pre: 27.4 ± 1.1, Post: 21.6 ± 7.4 °C, P = 0.03). These findings suggest that thermal behavior compensates for autonomic thermoeffector withdrawal in the presence of elevated core temperatures post-exercise. •Thermal behavior likely compensates for autonomic thermoeffector withdrawal during recovery from steady state exercise.•Core temperature plays a larger role vs. skin temperature in contributing to thermal behavior during exercise and recovery.•These contributions to thermal behavior may be dependent on exercise intensity and environmental conditions.
ISSN:0031-9384
1873-507X
DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.001