Loading…
Contrast-enhanced MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: lesion-to-background parenchymal signal enhancement ratio for discriminating pathological complete response from minimal residual tumour
Objectives To retrospectively investigate whether the lesion-to-background parenchymal signal enhancement ratio (SER) on breast MRI can distinguish pathological complete response (pCR) from minimal residual cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT), and compare its performance with the convent...
Saved in:
Published in: | European radiology 2018-07, Vol.28 (7), p.2986-2995 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objectives
To retrospectively investigate whether the lesion-to-background parenchymal signal enhancement ratio (SER) on breast MRI can distinguish pathological complete response (pCR) from minimal residual cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT), and compare its performance with the conventional criterion.
Methods
216 breast cancer patients who had undergone NAT and MRI and achieved pCR or minimal residual cancer on surgical histopathology were included. Clinical-pathological features, SER and lesion size on MR images were analysed. Multivariate logistic regression, ROC curve and McNemar’s test were performed.
Results
SER on early-phase MR images was independently associated with pCR (odds ratio [OR], 0.286 [95% CI: 0.113–0.725],
p
= .008 for Reader 1; OR, 0.306 [95% CI: 0.111–0.841],
p
= .022 for Reader 2). Compared with the conventional criterion, SER ≤1.6 increased AUC (0.585–0.599 vs. 0.709–0.771,
p
=.001-.033) and specificity (21.9–27.4% vs. 80.8–86.3%,
p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00330-017-5251-8 |