Biomechanical investigation of two long bone growth modulation techniques by finite element simulations

ABSTRACT Implants used to correct pathological varus–valgus deformities (VVD) and leg length discrepancies (LLD) may not be optimized for the specific treatment, as suggested by their off‐label use. Detailed analysis of this issue has been limited by the poorly understood mechanical behavior of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of orthopaedic research 2018-05, Vol.36 (5), p.1398-1405
Main Authors: Schneider, Manuel, Buschbaum, Jan, Joeris, Alexander, Röhrle, Oliver, Dwyer, Jonathan, Hunter, James B., Reynolds, Richard A.K., Slongo, Theodor F., Gueorguiev, Boyko, Varga, Peter
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Biomechanical Phenomena
Bone Development
bone growth modulation
Bone Malalignment - physiopathology
Bone Malalignment - surgery
Bone Plates
Bone Screws
Eight‐Plate
Female
Finite Element Analysis
Humans
leg length discrepancy
Leg Length Inequality - physiopathology
Leg Length Inequality - surgery
Male
varus–valgus deformity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Implants used to correct pathological varus–valgus deformities (VVD) and leg length discrepancies (LLD) may not be optimized for the specific treatment, as suggested by their off‐label use. Detailed analysis of this issue has been limited by the poorly understood mechanical behavior of the growing physis and ignorance of the loads acting on the implants. The aim of this study was to predict and compare the loading conditions of a growth modulation implant in VVD and LLD treatments. Idealized finite element (FE) models of the juvenile distal femur treated with the Eight‐Plate implant were developed for VVD and LLD. Bone growth was simulated using thermal strains. The axial force in the plate was compared between the two treatments. Case‐specific plate forces were predicted by virtually reproducing the screw deformation visible on radiographs of LLD (N = 4) and VVD (N = 4) clinical cases. The simple FE models reproduced the clinical implant deformations well. The resulting forces ranged from 129 to 580 N for the VVD patients. For LLD, this range was from 295 to 1002 N per plate, that is, 590–2004 N for the entire physis. The higher forces in LLD could be explained by restricted screw divergence in the double‐sided implant application. For the first time, the loading conditions of a growth modulation implant were investigated and compared between two treatments by FE analyses, and the range of case‐specific loads was predicted. These simulation tools may be utilized for guiding appropriate usage and for efficient development of implants. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1398–1405, 2018.
ISSN:0736-0266
1554-527X
DOI:10.1002/jor.23762