Rational Design of Sulfur‐Doped Copper Catalysts for the Selective Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Formate

The selective electroreduction of CO2 to formate (or formic acid) is of great interest in the field of renewable‐energy utilization. In this work, we designed a sulfur‐doped Cu2O‐derived Cu catalyst and showed that the presence of sulfur can tune the selectivity of Cu significantly from the producti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ChemSusChem 2018-01, Vol.11 (1), p.320-326
Main Authors: Huang, Yun, Deng, Yilin, Handoko, Albertus D., Goh, Gregory K. L., Yeo, Boon Siang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Carbon dioxide
Carbon Dioxide - chemistry
carbon dioxide reduction
Catalysis
Catalysts
Copper
Copper - chemistry
Copper oxides
doping
electrocatalysis
Electrochemical Techniques - methods
Electrodes
Electrolysis
Electrowinning
Energy consumption
Energy utilization
Formates - chemistry
Formic acid
Hydrogen evolution reactions
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Oxidation-Reduction
Substrates
Sulfur
Sulfur - chemistry
Sulfur content
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The selective electroreduction of CO2 to formate (or formic acid) is of great interest in the field of renewable‐energy utilization. In this work, we designed a sulfur‐doped Cu2O‐derived Cu catalyst and showed that the presence of sulfur can tune the selectivity of Cu significantly from the production of various CO2 reduction products to almost exclusively formate. Sulfur is doped into the Cu catalysts by dipping the Cu substrates into ammonium polysulfide solutions. Catalyst films with the highest sulfur content of 2.7 at % showed the largest formate current density (jHCOO- ) of −13.9 mA cm−2 at −0.9 V versus the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), which is approximately 46 times larger than that previously reported for Cu(110) surfaces. At −0.8 V versus RHE, the faradaic efficiency of formate was maintained at approximately 75 % for 12 h of continuous electrolysis. Through the analysis of the evolution of the jHCOO- and jH2 values with the sulfur content, we show that sulfur doping increases formate production and suppresses the hydrogen evolution reaction. Ag–S and Cu–Se catalysts did not exhibit any significant enhancement towards the reduction of CO2 to formate. This demonstrates clearly that sulfur and copper acted synergistically to promote the selective formation of formate. A hypothesis about the role of sulfur is proposed and discussed. A little S makes a big difference: The presence of only 2.7 at % sulfur in a copper catalyst can tune its selectivity significantly for CO2 electroreduction from a wide range of products to almost exclusively formate [−13.9 mA cm−2 at −0.9 V vs. the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)]. A clear positive correlation between the sulfur content and the production of formate is demonstrated.
ISSN:1864-5631
1864-564X
DOI:10.1002/cssc.201701314