Loading…
Comparison of short-term outcomes between 2- and 3-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer
Summary Although 3-field lymph node dissection (3-FLD) is often performed for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the clinical effects of cervical lymph node dissection in addition to mediastinal and abdominal dissections on postoperative complications remain unclear. A total of 367...
Saved in:
Published in: | Diseases of the esophagus 2017-11, Vol.30 (11), p.1-8 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Summary
Although 3-field lymph node dissection (3-FLD) is often performed for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the clinical effects of cervical lymph node dissection in addition to mediastinal and abdominal dissections on postoperative complications remain unclear. A total of 367 ESCC patients who underwent curative esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer in our hospital from 2010 to 2015 were included in the study: 157 patients who underwent 2-field lymph node dissection (2-FLD) and 210 patients who underwent 3-FLD. Clinicopathological parameters and postoperative complications based on the Clavien–Dindo classification were compared between the two groups. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) analyses to compare the groups with well-balanced backgrounds. In terms of patient background, clinical T (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1120-8694 1442-2050 |
DOI: | 10.1093/dote/dox096 |