Loading…

Comparison of short-term outcomes between 2- and 3-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer

Summary Although 3-field lymph node dissection (3-FLD) is often performed for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the clinical effects of cervical lymph node dissection in addition to mediastinal and abdominal dissections on postoperative complications remain unclear. A total of 367...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diseases of the esophagus 2017-11, Vol.30 (11), p.1-8
Main Authors: Yamashita, K., Makino, T., Yamasaki, M., Tanaka, K., Hara, T., Miyazaki, Y., Takahashi, T., Kurokawa, Y., Nakajima, K., Takiguchi, S., Mori, M., Doki, Y.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Although 3-field lymph node dissection (3-FLD) is often performed for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the clinical effects of cervical lymph node dissection in addition to mediastinal and abdominal dissections on postoperative complications remain unclear. A total of 367 ESCC patients who underwent curative esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer in our hospital from 2010 to 2015 were included in the study: 157 patients who underwent 2-field lymph node dissection (2-FLD) and 210 patients who underwent 3-FLD. Clinicopathological parameters and postoperative complications based on the Clavien–Dindo classification were compared between the two groups. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) analyses to compare the groups with well-balanced backgrounds. In terms of patient background, clinical T (p
ISSN:1120-8694
1442-2050
DOI:10.1093/dote/dox096