Effectiveness of functional training on cardiorespiratory parameters: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Summary Background Functional training is a new training vision that was prepared from the gesture imitation of daily activities. Although your use has become popular in clinical practice, the influence of the several cardiorespiratory adjustments performed during the functional training in differen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical physiology and functional imaging 2018-07, Vol.38 (4), p.539-546
Main Authors: Rezende Barbosa, Marianne Penachini da Costa de, Oliveira, Vinicius Cunha, Silva, Anne Kastelianne França da, Pérez‐Riera, Andrés Ricardo, Vanderlei, Luiz Carlos
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
blood pressure
Clinical trials
Evaluation
exercise therapy
heart rate
Meta-analysis
oximetry
Oxygen consumption
Parameters
Quality
Randomization
respiratory rate
Systematic review
Training
Vanadium oxides
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Background Functional training is a new training vision that was prepared from the gesture imitation of daily activities. Although your use has become popular in clinical practice, the influence of the several cardiorespiratory adjustments performed during the functional training in different populations and conditions is unknown. So, the aim of this systematic review was to gather information in the literature regarding the influence of functional training on cardiorespiratory parameters. Methods We conducted search strategies on MEDLINE, PEDro, EMBASE, SportDiscus and Cochrane to identify randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of functional training on cardiorespiratory parameters. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the PEDro scale. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) summarized the evidence. Results Five original studies were included. Effects favoured functional training on oxygen consumption (VO2) at intermediate‐term follow‐up: weighted mean difference −1·0 (95% CI: 5·4–3·3), P = 0·642, and a small and not clinically important effect observed on VO2 favouring control at intermediate‐term follow‐up (i.e. mean difference of 1·30 (95% CI 1·07–1·53), P
ISSN:1475-0961
1475-097X
DOI:10.1111/cpf.12445