Explaining variation in ventral and inguinal hernia repair outcomes: A population-based analysis

Background No study has evaluated the relative importance of patient, surgeon, and hospital-level factors on surgeon and hospital variation in hernia reoperation rates. This population-based retrospective cohort study evaluated factors associated with variation in reoperation rates for recurrence af...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Surgery 2017-09, Vol.162 (3), p.628-639
Main Authors: Aquina, Christopher T., MD, MPH, Fleming, Fergal J., MD, Becerra, Adan Z., BA, Xu, Zhaomin, MD, Hensley, Bradley J., MD, MBA, Noyes, Katia, PhD, MPH, Monson, John R.T., MD, Jusko, Todd A., PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Clinical Competence
Cohort Studies
Confidence Intervals
Databases, Factual
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Female
Hernia, Inguinal - diagnosis
Hernia, Inguinal - surgery
Hernia, Ventral - diagnosis
Hernia, Ventral - surgery
Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects
Herniorrhaphy - methods
Hospitals, High-Volume - statistics & numerical data
Hospitals, Low-Volume
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
New York
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - physiopathology
Proportional Hazards Models
Recurrence
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
Surgery
Surgical Mesh - utilization
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background No study has evaluated the relative importance of patient, surgeon, and hospital-level factors on surgeon and hospital variation in hernia reoperation rates. This population-based retrospective cohort study evaluated factors associated with variation in reoperation rates for recurrence after initial ventral hernia repair and inguinal hernia repair. Methods The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System identified initial ventral hernia repairs and inguinal hernia repairs in New York state from 2003–2009. Mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed assessing factors associated with surgeon/hospital variation in 5-year reoperation rates for hernia recurrence. Results Among 78,267 ventral hernia repairs and 124,416 inguinal hernia repairs, the proportion of total variation in reoperation rates attributable to individual surgeons compared with hospitals was 87% for ventral hernia repairs and 92% for inguinal hernia repairs. In explaining variation in ventral hernia repair reoperation between surgeons, 19% was attributable to patient-level factors, 4% attributable to mesh placement, and 10% attributable to surgeon volume and type of board certification. In explaining variation in inguinal hernia repair reoperation between surgeons, 1.1% was attributable to mesh placement and 10% was attributable to surgeon volume and years of experience. However, 67% of the variation between surgeons for ventral hernia repair and 89% of the variation between surgeons for inguinal hernia repair remained unexplained by factors in the models. Conclusion The majority of variation in hernia reoperation rates is attributable to surgeon-level variation. This suggests that hernia recurrence may be an appropriate surgeon quality metric. While modifiable factors such as mesh placement and surgeon characteristics play roles in surgeon variation, future research should focus on identifying additional surgeon attributes responsible for this variation.
ISSN:0039-6060
1532-7361
DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2017.03.013