Loading…

Impairment in Social Functioning differentiates youth meeting Ultra-High Risk for psychosis criteria from other mental health help-seekers: A validation of the Italian version of the Global Functioning:Social and Global Functioning:Role scales

Abstract Social and occupational impairments are present in the schizophrenia prodrome, and poor social functioning predicts transition to psychosis in Ultra-High Risk (UHR) individuals. We aimed to: 1) validate the Italian version of the Global Functioning:Social (GF:S) and Global Functioning:Role...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychiatry research 2017-07, Vol.253, p.296-302
Main Authors: Cascio, Nella Lo, Curto, Martina, Pasqualetti, Patrizio, Lindau, Juliana Fortes, Girardi, Nicoletta, Saba, Riccardo, Brandizzi, Martina, Monducci, Elena, Masillo, Alice, Colafrancesco, Giada, Solfanelli, Andrea, De Crescenzo, Franco, Kotzalidis, Georgios D, Dario, Claudia, Ferrara, Mauro, Vicari, Stefano, Girardi, Paolo, Auther, Andrea M, Cornblatt, Barbara A, Correll, Christoph U, Nastro, Paolo Fiori
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Social and occupational impairments are present in the schizophrenia prodrome, and poor social functioning predicts transition to psychosis in Ultra-High Risk (UHR) individuals. We aimed to: 1) validate the Italian version of the Global Functioning:Social (GF:S) and Global Functioning:Role (GF:S) scales; 2) evaluate their association with UHR criteria. Participants were 12 to 21-years-old (age, mean=15.2, standard deviation=2.1, male/female ratio=117/120) nonpsychotic help-seekers, meeting (N=39) or not (N=198) UHR criteria. Inter-rater reliability was excellent for both scales, which also showed good to excellent concurrent validity, as measured by correlation with Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores. Furthermore, GF:S and GF:R were able to discriminate between UHRs and non-UHRs, with UHRs having lower current scores. After adjusting for current GAF scores, only current GF:S scores independently differentiated UHR from non-UHR. Finally, UHR participants showed a steeper decrease from highest GF:S and GF:R scores in the past year to their respective current scores, but not from highest past year GAF scores to current scores. GF:S/GS:R scores were not affected by age or sex. GF:S/GF:R are useful functional level and outcome measures, having the advantage over the GAF to not confound functioning with symptom severity. Additionally, the GF:S may be helpful in identifying UHR individuals.
ISSN:0165-1781
1872-7123
DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.04.008