The Role of Predictability in Intonational Variability

Predictability is known to affect many properties of speech production. In particular, it has been observed that highly predictable elements (words, syllables) are produced with less phonetic prominence (shorter duration, less peripheral vowels) than less predictable elements. This tendency has been...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Language and speech 2017-03, Vol.60 (1), p.123-153
Main Author: Turnbull, Rory
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acoustic Stimulation
Cognition
Cues
English
Fundamental frequency
Humans
Intonation
North American English
Phonetics
Phonology
Pitch Perception
Research Design
Semantics
Semiotics
Speech Acoustics
Speech Intelligibility
Speech Perception
Speech production
Speech Production Measurement
Time Factors
Voice Quality
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Predictability is known to affect many properties of speech production. In particular, it has been observed that highly predictable elements (words, syllables) are produced with less phonetic prominence (shorter duration, less peripheral vowels) than less predictable elements. This tendency has been proposed to be a general property of language. This paper examines whether predictability is correlated with fundamental frequency (F0) production, through analysis of experimental corpora of American English. Predictability was variously defined as discourse mention, utterance probability, and semantic focus. The results revealed consistent effects of utterance probability and semantic focus on F0, in the expected direction: less predictable words were produced with a higher F0 than more predictable words. However, no effect of discourse mention was observed. These results provide further empirical support for the generalization that phonetic prominence is inversely related to linguistic predictability. In addition, the divergent results for different predictability measures suggests that the parameterization of predictability within a particular experimental design can have significant impact on the interpretation of results, and that it cannot be assumed that two measures necessarily reflect the same cognitive reality.
ISSN:0023-8309
1756-6053
DOI:10.1177/0023830916647079