Loading…
Hidden high rate of pre‐eclampsia in twin compared with singleton pregnancy
ABSTRACT Objectives To examine the gestational age at delivery in dichorionic (DC) and monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies, with and without pre‐eclampsia (PE), and to determine the relative risk of total and preterm PE compared with that in singleton pregnancies. Methods This was a screening study...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2017-07, Vol.50 (1), p.88-92 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ABSTRACT
Objectives
To examine the gestational age at delivery in dichorionic (DC) and monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies, with and without pre‐eclampsia (PE), and to determine the relative risk of total and preterm PE compared with that in singleton pregnancies.
Methods
This was a screening study for PE in twin pregnancies undergoing first‐trimester combined screening for aneuploidy and subsequently delivering two phenotypically normal live or stillborn babies at ≥ 24 weeks' gestation. The distribution of gestational age at delivery in DC and MC twins was determined and compared with that in singleton pregnancies from the same population. The relative risk for total and preterm PE in twins compared with singleton pregnancies was determined. Kaplan–Meier estimates of the cumulative incidence of PE in twin and singleton pregnancies, assuming no other cause for delivery, were determined and hazard ratios for twins relative to singletons were obtained from a Cox proportional hazards regression model.
Results
The incidence of PE in singletons was 2.3% (2162/93 297), in DC twin pregnancies was 8.1% (145/1789) and in MC twin pregnancies was 6.0% (26/430). Compared with singletons, the relative risk of total PE was 3.5 for DC twins and 2.6 for MC twins. Delivery |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-7692 1469-0705 |
DOI: | 10.1002/uog.17470 |