Loading…

Safety of quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine in subjects aged 2–49years

•Q/LAIV is similar to T/LAIV, with an additional influenza B vaccine strain.•62,040 Q/LAIV recipients were enrolled in this prospective observational study.•Rates of events after vaccination were compared versus later in the follow-up.•Rates were also compared versus IIV recipients and unvaccinated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vaccine 2017-03, Vol.35 (9), p.1254-1258
Main Authors: Baxter, Roger, Eaton, Abigail, Hansen, John, Aukes, Laurie, Caspard, Herve, Ambrose, Christopher S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Q/LAIV is similar to T/LAIV, with an additional influenza B vaccine strain.•62,040 Q/LAIV recipients were enrolled in this prospective observational study.•Rates of events after vaccination were compared versus later in the follow-up.•Rates were also compared versus IIV recipients and unvaccinated controls.•No safety signal associated with administration of Q/LAIV was observed. Quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (Q/LAIV) was licensed in 2012 and replaced trivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine in the United States during the 2013–2014 influenza season. This study assessed the safety of Q/LAIV in children and adults aged 2–49years. This was a prospective observational cohort study using data collected from Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Post-vaccination events of interest were any hospitalization, hospitalization for lower respiratory tract infection, and the following medically attended events: hypersensitivity, seizures/convulsions, lower respiratory tract infection, wheezing, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Bell’s palsy, encephalitis, neuritis, vasculitis, and narcolepsy/cataplexy. The rates of these events during the risk interval post-vaccination were compared with rates observed during reference periods later in the follow-up (within-cohort analysis) and with rates observed in frequency-matched unvaccinated controls and inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) recipients. A total of 62,040 eligible Q/LAIV recipients were identified during the 2013–2014 influenza season. Within-cohort comparisons of all Q/LAIV recipients as well as comparisons between Q/LAIV recipients and unvaccinated controls or IIV recipients did not show any significantly higher risk of hospitalizations or medically attended events following administration of Q/LAIV. Additional analyses by setting (clinic visits, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions) and age group (2–4, 5–8, 9–17, and 18–49years) also did not reveal clinically consistent findings that suggested any increased risk after administration of Q/LAIV. In this large population study of individuals aged 2–49years, no safety signals associated with the administration of Q/LAIV were observed. A much larger study population would be needed to confidently reject any association between Q/LAIV and very rare events, specifically those with an incidence of
ISSN:0264-410X
1873-2518
DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.01.062