Loading…

Comparison between titrimetric and spectrophotometric methods for quantification of vitamin C

•Spectrophotometric and titrimetric methods for AA quantification.•Linearity, precision, accuracy, limits of detection and quantification were evaluated using standard AA solution.•Spectrophotometric method was more accurate (error 15%. Vitamin C is usually quantified by titrimetric or chromatograph...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food chemistry 2017-06, Vol.224, p.92-96
Main Authors: da Silva, T.L., Aguiar-Oliveira, E., Mazalli, M.R., Kamimura, E.S., Maldonado, R.R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Spectrophotometric and titrimetric methods for AA quantification.•Linearity, precision, accuracy, limits of detection and quantification were evaluated using standard AA solution.•Spectrophotometric method was more accurate (error 15%. Vitamin C is usually quantified by titrimetric or chromatographic methods. However, these methods have limitations: food color interferes with the titrimetric method and the chromatographic method is costly. The aim of this study was to compare a spectrophotometric method, based on reduction of cupric ions in the presence of cuproine complex, with a titrimetric method, based on reduction of 2,6-dicholorophenolindophenol. Linearity, precision, accuracy, and limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were evaluated using a standard vitamin C solution. Both methods were also applied for AA quantification in industrialized orange and pineapple juices. The methods were precise and accurate when applied to the standard solution. The spectrophotometric method was more sensitive, with lower values for LOD (0.002mgmL−1) and LOQ (0.010mgmL−1), and more accurate with error less than 5% while results from the titrimetric method were affected by the juice color, which generated errors in excess of 15%.
ISSN:0308-8146
1873-7072
DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.12.052