A Comparison of Cognitive Function in Former Rugby Union Players Compared with Former Non-Contact-Sport Players and the Impact of Concussion History

Aim This study investigated differences in cognitive function between former rugby and non-contact-sport players, and assessed the association between concussion history and cognitive function. Methods Overall, 366 former players (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age 43.3 ± 8.2 years) were recruited f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sports medicine (Auckland) 2017-06, Vol.47 (6), p.1209-1220
Main Authors: Hume, Patria A., Theadom, Alice, Lewis, Gwyn N., Quarrie, Kenneth L., Brown, Scott R., Hill, Rosamund, Marshall, Stephen W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Athletes
Athletic Injuries
Attention
Brain Concussion - diagnosis
Brain Concussion - psychology
Censuses
Central nervous system
Cognition
Cognition - physiology
Cognition Disorders - diagnosis
Cognitive ability
Concussion
Cross-Sectional Studies
Demographics
Executive function
Flexibility
Football - injuries
Group dynamics
Humans
Information processing
Internet
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Memory
Middle Aged
Motor task performance
Neuropsychological Tests
Neurosurgery
New Zealand
Original Research Article
Reaction time task
Rugby
Rugby Health
Sports injuries
Sports Medicine
Sports related injuries
Traumatic brain injury
Vital signs
Vital statistics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim This study investigated differences in cognitive function between former rugby and non-contact-sport players, and assessed the association between concussion history and cognitive function. Methods Overall, 366 former players (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age 43.3 ± 8.2 years) were recruited from October 2012 to April 2014. Engagement in sport, general health, sports injuries and concussion history, and demographic information were obtained from an online self-report questionnaire. Cognitive functioning was assessed using the online CNS Vital Signs neuropsychological test battery. Cohen’s d effect size statistics were calculated for comparisons across player groups, concussion groups (one or more self-reported concussions versus no concussions) and between those groups with CNS Vital Signs age-matched norms (US norms). Individual differences within groups were represented as SDs. Results The elite-rugby group ( n  = 103) performed worse on tests of complex attention, processing speed, executive functioning, and cognitive flexibility than the non-contact-sport group ( n  = 65), and worse than the community-rugby group ( n  = 193) on complex attention. The community-rugby group performed worse than the non-contact group on executive functioning and cognitive flexibility. Compared with US norms, all three former player groups performed worse on verbal memory and reaction time; rugby groups performed worse on processing speed, cognitive flexibility and executive functioning; and the community-rugby group performed worse on composite memory. The community-rugby group and non-contact-sport group performed slightly better than US norms on complex attention, as did the elite-rugby group for motor speed. All three player groups had greater individual differences than US norms on composite memory, verbal memory and reaction time. The elite-rugby group had greater individual differences on processing speed and complex attention, and the community-rugby group had greater individual differences on psychomotor speed and motor speed. The average number of concussions recalled per player was greater for elite rugby and community rugby than non-contact sport. Former players who recalled one or more concussions (elite rugby, 85 %; community rugby, 77 %; non-contact sport, 23 %) had worse scores on cognitive flexibility, executive functioning, and complex attention than players who did not recall experiencing a concussion. Conclusions Past participation in rugby or a h
ISSN:0112-1642
1179-2035
DOI:10.1007/s40279-016-0608-8