Loading…
Introduced Species, Disease Ecology, and Biodiversity–Disease Relationships
Species introductions are a dominant component of biodiversity change but are not explicitly included in most discussions of biodiversity–disease relationships. This is a major oversight given the multitude of effects that introduced species have on both parasitism and native hosts. Drawing on both...
Saved in:
Published in: | Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) 2017-01, Vol.32 (1), p.41-54 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Species introductions are a dominant component of biodiversity change but are not explicitly included in most discussions of biodiversity–disease relationships. This is a major oversight given the multitude of effects that introduced species have on both parasitism and native hosts. Drawing on both animal and plant systems, we review the competing mechanistic pathways by which biological introductions influence parasite diversity and prevalence. While some mechanisms – such as local changes in phylogenetic composition and global homogenization – have strong explanatory potential, the net effects of introduced species, especially at local scales, remain poorly understood. Integrative, community-scale studies that explicitly incorporate introduced species are needed to make effective predictions about the effects of realistic biodiversity change and conservation action on disease.
Introduced species can have strong effects on parasite prevalence and richness.
Introductions primarily affect disease via changes in host composition, not richness.
Local effects of introduced species can amplify or dilute parasite prevalence.
Global homogenization and spread of human commensals systematically increase disease. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0169-5347 1872-8383 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.008 |