Loading…

A Clinical Comparison of Anterior Cervical Plates versus Stand-Alone Intervertebral Fusion Devices for Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedures

Abstract Objective To compare radiologic and clinical outcomes, including rates of dysphagia and dysphonia, using a no-profile stand-alone intervertebral spacer with integrated screw fixation versus an anterior cervical plate and spacer construct for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World neurosurgery 2017-03, Vol.99, p.630-637
Main Authors: Panchal, Ripul R., DO, Kim, Kee D., MD, Eastlack, Robert, MD, Lopez, John, MD, Clavenna, Andrew, MD, Brooks, Daina M., BS, Joshua, Gita, MA
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective To compare radiologic and clinical outcomes, including rates of dysphagia and dysphonia, using a no-profile stand-alone intervertebral spacer with integrated screw fixation versus an anterior cervical plate and spacer construct for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. Methods This multicenter, randomized, prospective study included 54 patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) requiring ACDF at a single level at C3–C7. Twenty-six patients underwent single-level ACDF with stand-alone spacers (SA), and 28 with plate fixation and spacers (PS). Analyses were based on comparison of perioperative outcomes, radiological and clinical metrics, and incidence of dysphagia and/or dysphonia. Results Mean patient age was 48.8±10.1years (53.7% female). No significant differences were observed between groups in operative time (101.8±34.4min, 114.4±31.5min), estimated blood loss (44.8±76.5cc, 82.5±195.1cc), or length of hospital stay (1.2±0.6days, 1.3±0.6days). Mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores improved significantly from preoperative to last follow-up (10.8±2.6mo) in both groups ( P
ISSN:1878-8750
1878-8769
DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.060