Loading…

Type of chromosome abnormality affects embryo morphology dynamics

Objective To study the differences in the cleavage time between types of embryo chromosomal abnormalities and elaborate algorithm to exclude aneuploid embryos according to the likelihood to be euploid. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting University affiliated private center. Patient(s) Preimp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fertility and sterility 2017-01, Vol.107 (1), p.229-235.e2
Main Authors: Del Carmen Nogales, Maria, Ph.D, Bronet, Fernando, Ph.D, Basile, Natalia, Ph.D, Martínez, Eva María, Ph.D, Liñán, Alberto, Ph.D, Rodrigo, Lorena, Ph.D, Meseguer, Marcos, Ph.D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-91f1b52edbe40f5ae85ffd268d8c9cadb52359f5291cc39e6d6e8f9ee3170d7d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-91f1b52edbe40f5ae85ffd268d8c9cadb52359f5291cc39e6d6e8f9ee3170d7d3
container_end_page 235.e2
container_issue 1
container_start_page 229
container_title Fertility and sterility
container_volume 107
creator Del Carmen Nogales, Maria, Ph.D
Bronet, Fernando, Ph.D
Basile, Natalia, Ph.D
Martínez, Eva María, Ph.D
Liñán, Alberto, Ph.D
Rodrigo, Lorena, Ph.D
Meseguer, Marcos, Ph.D
description Objective To study the differences in the cleavage time between types of embryo chromosomal abnormalities and elaborate algorithm to exclude aneuploid embryos according to the likelihood to be euploid. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting University affiliated private center. Patient(s) Preimplantational genetic screening patients (n = 112) including cases of advanced maternal age, repeated implantation failure, and recurrent miscarriage. A total of 485 embryos were analyzed. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) All biopsied embryos were cultured in an incubator with time-lapse technology, cleavage timing from insemination to day 3 and all kinetic parameters that have been described in previous studies by our group. Result(s) Logistic regression analysis were used to identify morphokinetic parameters and some were strongly associated with complex aneuploid embryos; t3 (odds ratio = 0.590, 95% confidence interval 0.359–0.971) and t5–t2 (odds ratio = 0.151, 95% confidence interval 0.082–0.278). Conclusion(s) Embryo morphokinetics are affected by chromosome aneuploidy and further analysis of the chromosome content reveals higher differences when the complexity in the chromosome disorders is increased. The use of time-lapse monitoring, although not able to detect an abnormal embryo, may be potentially useful to discard those embryos with high risk of complex chromosomal abnormalities.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.019
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837029145</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S001502821662839X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1837029145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-91f1b52edbe40f5ae85ffd268d8c9cadb52359f5291cc39e6d6e8f9ee3170d7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rHDEMhk1paLZp_0KZYy4z9cfaY18KaUiTQKCHJJCb8dhy4u14vLFnA_Pv62WTFnrqRQLpfSX0CKGG4I5gIr5uOg95nspcY0drpcOqw0S9QyvCuWi54Ow9WmFMeIuppMfoYykbjLEgPf2AjmkviaAMr9DZ3bKFJvnGPuUUU0kRGjNMKUczhnlpjPdg59JAHPKSmpjy9imN6XFp3DKZGGz5hI68GQt8fs0n6P7Hxd35VXvz8_L6_Oymteteza0ingycghtgjT03ILn3jgrppFXWuNpjXHlOFbGWKRBOgPQKgJEeu96xE3R6mLvN6XkHZdYxFAvjaCZIu6KJZD2u7jWvUnmQ2pxKyeD1Nodo8qIJ1nuAeqP_AtR7gBorXQFW65fXLbshgvtjfCNWBd8PAqi3vgTIutgAkwUXciWlXQr_s-XbP0PsGKZgzfgLFiibtMtTZamJLlRjfbt_5P6PRAgqmXpgvwGCap3c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1837029145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Type of chromosome abnormality affects embryo morphology dynamics</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Del Carmen Nogales, Maria, Ph.D ; Bronet, Fernando, Ph.D ; Basile, Natalia, Ph.D ; Martínez, Eva María, Ph.D ; Liñán, Alberto, Ph.D ; Rodrigo, Lorena, Ph.D ; Meseguer, Marcos, Ph.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Del Carmen Nogales, Maria, Ph.D ; Bronet, Fernando, Ph.D ; Basile, Natalia, Ph.D ; Martínez, Eva María, Ph.D ; Liñán, Alberto, Ph.D ; Rodrigo, Lorena, Ph.D ; Meseguer, Marcos, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To study the differences in the cleavage time between types of embryo chromosomal abnormalities and elaborate algorithm to exclude aneuploid embryos according to the likelihood to be euploid. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting University affiliated private center. Patient(s) Preimplantational genetic screening patients (n = 112) including cases of advanced maternal age, repeated implantation failure, and recurrent miscarriage. A total of 485 embryos were analyzed. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) All biopsied embryos were cultured in an incubator with time-lapse technology, cleavage timing from insemination to day 3 and all kinetic parameters that have been described in previous studies by our group. Result(s) Logistic regression analysis were used to identify morphokinetic parameters and some were strongly associated with complex aneuploid embryos; t3 (odds ratio = 0.590, 95% confidence interval 0.359–0.971) and t5–t2 (odds ratio = 0.151, 95% confidence interval 0.082–0.278). Conclusion(s) Embryo morphokinetics are affected by chromosome aneuploidy and further analysis of the chromosome content reveals higher differences when the complexity in the chromosome disorders is increased. The use of time-lapse monitoring, although not able to detect an abnormal embryo, may be potentially useful to discard those embryos with high risk of complex chromosomal abnormalities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27816230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aneuploidy ; array CGH ; Biopsy ; Blastocyst - pathology ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Chromosome Disorders - diagnosis ; Chromosome Disorders - genetics ; Chromosome Disorders - pathology ; Chromosomes, Human ; Comparative Genomic Hybridization ; complex abnormalities ; Embryo kinetics ; Embryonic Development ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - adverse effects ; Genetic Testing ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Kinetics ; Logistic Models ; Microscopy, Video ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Odds Ratio ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Pregnancy ; Preimplantation Diagnosis - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; time lapse ; Time-Lapse Imaging - methods</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2017-01, Vol.107 (1), p.229-235.e2</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-91f1b52edbe40f5ae85ffd268d8c9cadb52359f5291cc39e6d6e8f9ee3170d7d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-91f1b52edbe40f5ae85ffd268d8c9cadb52359f5291cc39e6d6e8f9ee3170d7d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001502821662839X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,3568,27957,27958,45815</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27816230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Del Carmen Nogales, Maria, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronet, Fernando, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basile, Natalia, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Eva María, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liñán, Alberto, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigo, Lorena, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meseguer, Marcos, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><title>Type of chromosome abnormality affects embryo morphology dynamics</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To study the differences in the cleavage time between types of embryo chromosomal abnormalities and elaborate algorithm to exclude aneuploid embryos according to the likelihood to be euploid. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting University affiliated private center. Patient(s) Preimplantational genetic screening patients (n = 112) including cases of advanced maternal age, repeated implantation failure, and recurrent miscarriage. A total of 485 embryos were analyzed. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) All biopsied embryos were cultured in an incubator with time-lapse technology, cleavage timing from insemination to day 3 and all kinetic parameters that have been described in previous studies by our group. Result(s) Logistic regression analysis were used to identify morphokinetic parameters and some were strongly associated with complex aneuploid embryos; t3 (odds ratio = 0.590, 95% confidence interval 0.359–0.971) and t5–t2 (odds ratio = 0.151, 95% confidence interval 0.082–0.278). Conclusion(s) Embryo morphokinetics are affected by chromosome aneuploidy and further analysis of the chromosome content reveals higher differences when the complexity in the chromosome disorders is increased. The use of time-lapse monitoring, although not able to detect an abnormal embryo, may be potentially useful to discard those embryos with high risk of complex chromosomal abnormalities.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aneuploidy</subject><subject>array CGH</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Blastocyst - pathology</subject><subject>Chromosome Aberrations</subject><subject>Chromosome Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Chromosome Disorders - genetics</subject><subject>Chromosome Disorders - pathology</subject><subject>Chromosomes, Human</subject><subject>Comparative Genomic Hybridization</subject><subject>complex abnormalities</subject><subject>Embryo kinetics</subject><subject>Embryonic Development</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - adverse effects</subject><subject>Genetic Testing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Microscopy, Video</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Preimplantation Diagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>time lapse</subject><subject>Time-Lapse Imaging - methods</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1rHDEMhk1paLZp_0KZYy4z9cfaY18KaUiTQKCHJJCb8dhy4u14vLFnA_Pv62WTFnrqRQLpfSX0CKGG4I5gIr5uOg95nspcY0drpcOqw0S9QyvCuWi54Ow9WmFMeIuppMfoYykbjLEgPf2AjmkviaAMr9DZ3bKFJvnGPuUUU0kRGjNMKUczhnlpjPdg59JAHPKSmpjy9imN6XFp3DKZGGz5hI68GQt8fs0n6P7Hxd35VXvz8_L6_Oymteteza0ingycghtgjT03ILn3jgrppFXWuNpjXHlOFbGWKRBOgPQKgJEeu96xE3R6mLvN6XkHZdYxFAvjaCZIu6KJZD2u7jWvUnmQ2pxKyeD1Nodo8qIJ1nuAeqP_AtR7gBorXQFW65fXLbshgvtjfCNWBd8PAqi3vgTIutgAkwUXciWlXQr_s-XbP0PsGKZgzfgLFiibtMtTZamJLlRjfbt_5P6PRAgqmXpgvwGCap3c</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Del Carmen Nogales, Maria, Ph.D</creator><creator>Bronet, Fernando, Ph.D</creator><creator>Basile, Natalia, Ph.D</creator><creator>Martínez, Eva María, Ph.D</creator><creator>Liñán, Alberto, Ph.D</creator><creator>Rodrigo, Lorena, Ph.D</creator><creator>Meseguer, Marcos, Ph.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Type of chromosome abnormality affects embryo morphology dynamics</title><author>Del Carmen Nogales, Maria, Ph.D ; Bronet, Fernando, Ph.D ; Basile, Natalia, Ph.D ; Martínez, Eva María, Ph.D ; Liñán, Alberto, Ph.D ; Rodrigo, Lorena, Ph.D ; Meseguer, Marcos, Ph.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-91f1b52edbe40f5ae85ffd268d8c9cadb52359f5291cc39e6d6e8f9ee3170d7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aneuploidy</topic><topic>array CGH</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Blastocyst - pathology</topic><topic>Chromosome Aberrations</topic><topic>Chromosome Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Chromosome Disorders - genetics</topic><topic>Chromosome Disorders - pathology</topic><topic>Chromosomes, Human</topic><topic>Comparative Genomic Hybridization</topic><topic>complex abnormalities</topic><topic>Embryo kinetics</topic><topic>Embryonic Development</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - adverse effects</topic><topic>Genetic Testing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Microscopy, Video</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Preimplantation Diagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>time lapse</topic><topic>Time-Lapse Imaging - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Del Carmen Nogales, Maria, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronet, Fernando, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basile, Natalia, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Eva María, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liñán, Alberto, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigo, Lorena, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meseguer, Marcos, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Del Carmen Nogales, Maria, Ph.D</au><au>Bronet, Fernando, Ph.D</au><au>Basile, Natalia, Ph.D</au><au>Martínez, Eva María, Ph.D</au><au>Liñán, Alberto, Ph.D</au><au>Rodrigo, Lorena, Ph.D</au><au>Meseguer, Marcos, Ph.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Type of chromosome abnormality affects embryo morphology dynamics</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>235.e2</epage><pages>229-235.e2</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Objective To study the differences in the cleavage time between types of embryo chromosomal abnormalities and elaborate algorithm to exclude aneuploid embryos according to the likelihood to be euploid. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting University affiliated private center. Patient(s) Preimplantational genetic screening patients (n = 112) including cases of advanced maternal age, repeated implantation failure, and recurrent miscarriage. A total of 485 embryos were analyzed. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) All biopsied embryos were cultured in an incubator with time-lapse technology, cleavage timing from insemination to day 3 and all kinetic parameters that have been described in previous studies by our group. Result(s) Logistic regression analysis were used to identify morphokinetic parameters and some were strongly associated with complex aneuploid embryos; t3 (odds ratio = 0.590, 95% confidence interval 0.359–0.971) and t5–t2 (odds ratio = 0.151, 95% confidence interval 0.082–0.278). Conclusion(s) Embryo morphokinetics are affected by chromosome aneuploidy and further analysis of the chromosome content reveals higher differences when the complexity in the chromosome disorders is increased. The use of time-lapse monitoring, although not able to detect an abnormal embryo, may be potentially useful to discard those embryos with high risk of complex chromosomal abnormalities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27816230</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.019</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-0282
ispartof Fertility and sterility, 2017-01, Vol.107 (1), p.229-235.e2
issn 0015-0282
1556-5653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837029145
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aneuploidy
array CGH
Biopsy
Blastocyst - pathology
Chromosome Aberrations
Chromosome Disorders - diagnosis
Chromosome Disorders - genetics
Chromosome Disorders - pathology
Chromosomes, Human
Comparative Genomic Hybridization
complex abnormalities
Embryo kinetics
Embryonic Development
Female
Fertilization in Vitro - adverse effects
Genetic Testing
Humans
Internal Medicine
Kinetics
Logistic Models
Microscopy, Video
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Odds Ratio
Predictive Value of Tests
Pregnancy
Preimplantation Diagnosis - methods
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
time lapse
Time-Lapse Imaging - methods
title Type of chromosome abnormality affects embryo morphology dynamics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T04%3A27%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Type%20of%20chromosome%20abnormality%20affects%20embryo%20morphology%20dynamics&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Del%20Carmen%20Nogales,%20Maria,%20Ph.D&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=235.e2&rft.pages=229-235.e2&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1837029145%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-91f1b52edbe40f5ae85ffd268d8c9cadb52359f5291cc39e6d6e8f9ee3170d7d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1837029145&rft_id=info:pmid/27816230&rfr_iscdi=true