Biennial lung cancer screening in Canada with smoking cessation—outcomes and cost-effectiveness

Highlights • Lung cancer screening by CT decreases mortality but consumes resources. • Our model suggests that biennial screening is more cost-effective than annual. • Over a 20 year screening program, quality-adjusted life-years saved are similar. • Average incremental CT scan use with biennial scr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2016-11, Vol.101, p.98-103
Main Authors: Goffin, John R., MD, FRCPC, Flanagan, William M., BM, Miller, Anthony B., MD, FRCPC, Fitzgerald, Natalie R., MA, Memon, Saima, MBBS, MPH, Wolfson, Michael C., PhD, Evans, William K., MD, FRCPC
Format: Article
Language:eng
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Highlights • Lung cancer screening by CT decreases mortality but consumes resources. • Our model suggests that biennial screening is more cost-effective than annual. • Over a 20 year screening program, quality-adjusted life-years saved are similar. • Average incremental CT scan use with biennial screening is half that of annual. • Adding a smoking cessation program to screening improves cost-effectiveness.
ISSN:0169-5002
1872-8332