Loading…

Clinical relevance commentary in response to: Relative motion orthoses in the management of various hand conditions: A scoping review

Scoping reviews are intended to map out the landscape of the existing literature on a subject and are used effectively when the concept is broad, has several potential clinical applications, and has not been studied in detail.1 They differ from systematic reviews, where the focus in usually on a wel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hand therapy 2016-10, Vol.29 (4), p.505-506
Main Author: Szekeres, Mike, PhD(c), OT Reg (Ont), CHT
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Scoping reviews are intended to map out the landscape of the existing literature on a subject and are used effectively when the concept is broad, has several potential clinical applications, and has not been studied in detail.1 They differ from systematic reviews, where the focus in usually on a well-defined question and includes a detailed assessment of the quality of studies within.2 In general, scoping reviews are usually not appropriate for answering a clinical question but rather are used to identify gaps in the literature and provide a direction for future research. The authors of this article seek to critically examine the scope of evidence supporting the use of RM in the treatment of various hand and finger injuries, the details surrounding finger positioning, and orthotic designs by injury type.
ISSN:0894-1130
1545-004X
DOI:10.1016/j.jht.2016.09.003