Effects of Riparian Buffer Vegetation and Width: A 12‐Year Longitudinal Study

Agricultural contributions of nitrogen are a serious concern for many water resources and have spurred the implementation of riparian buffer zones to reduce groundwater nitrate (NO3). The optimum design for buffers is subject to debate, and there are few long‐term studies. The objective of this proj...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental quality 2016-07, Vol.45 (4), p.1243-1251
Main Authors: King, S. E., Osmond, D. L., Smith, J., Burchell, M. R., Dukes, M., Evans, R. O., Knies, S., Kunickis, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Agricultural contributions of nitrogen are a serious concern for many water resources and have spurred the implementation of riparian buffer zones to reduce groundwater nitrate (NO3). The optimum design for buffers is subject to debate, and there are few long‐term studies. The objective of this project was to determine the effectiveness over time (12 yr) of buffer types (trees, switchgrass, fescue, native, and a control) and buffer widths (8 and 15 m) by measuring groundwater NO3–N and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) trends. At the intermediate groundwater depth (1.5–2.1 m), NO3–N reduction effectiveness was 2.5 times greater (46 vs. 16%) for the wider buffer, and, regardless of width, buffer effectiveness increased 0.62% yr−1. Buffer vegetative type was never statistically significant. In the deep‐groundwater depth (2.1–3.5 m), there was no change in NO3–N removal over time, although the statistical interaction of width and vegetative type indicated a wide range of removal rates (19–82%). The DOC concentrations were analyzed at the field/buffer and buffer/stream sampling locations. Depending on location position and groundwater sampling depth, DOC concentrations ranged from 1.6 to 2.8 mg L−1 at Year 0 and increased at a rate of 0.13 to 0.18 mg L−1 yr−1 but always remained low (≤5.0 mg L−1). Greater DOC concentrations in the intermediate‐depth groundwater did not increase NO3–N removal; redox measurements indicated intermittent reduced soil conditions may have been limiting. This study suggests that riparian buffer width, not vegetation, is more important for NO3–N removal in the middle coastal plain of North Carolina for a newly established buffer. Core Ideas Unique, long‐term replicated riparian buffer study in the southeastern United States. Long‐term riparian buffer study from establishment through Year 12. Effects of five different riparian‐buffer vegetation types of nitrate reduction.
ISSN:0047-2425
1537-2537
DOI:10.2134/jeq2015.06.0321