Forest understory vegetation along a productivity gradient

Species diversity is generally considered to have a unimodal relationship with productivity where diversity reaches a maximum at intermediate productivity due to abiotic limitation at low productivity and competitive exclusion at high productivity. Various patterns in this relationship have been det...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 2004-01, Vol.131 (1), p.32-44
Main Authors: Adkison, G.P, Gleeson, S.K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
abiotic stress
canopy gaps
community structure
competitive exclusion
Deciduous forests
diversity-productivity relationship
Ecological competition
Forest soils
herbaceous plants
light intensity
plant competition
plant stress
Plants
population size
Productivity
shade tolerance
soil water content
spatial distribution
Species
Species diversity
Understory
Vegetation
vegetation cover
Watersheds
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Species diversity is generally considered to have a unimodal relationship with productivity where diversity reaches a maximum at intermediate productivity due to abiotic limitation at low productivity and competitive exclusion at high productivity. Various patterns in this relationship have been detected in understory communities of U.S. eastern deciduous forests, raising questions about the effects of abiotic limitation and competition in these communities. We examined vegetation structure and species distribution patterns in the forest understory community of two topographically similar watersheds to evaluate the predicted roles of abiotic limitation and competition along a productivity gradient. Canonical correspondence analysis identified a dominant compositional gradient that was strongly correlated with moisture, light, and herbaceous-layer cover. Given these relationships, the first axis of the ordination was taken as a reliable index of productivity. Contrary to expectation, species richness increased monotonically along the gradient rather than reaching a maximum and then declining which suggests that species are not excluded by light competition at the high-productivity end of the gradient. Other vegetation patterns, however, indicated both abiotic limitation in regions of low productivity and competition at high productivity. Patterns in species' distributions also suggested resource limitation at low productivity, but they showed mixed evidence of competition at high productivity. Taken together, these patterns in vegetation structure and species' distributions imply that while competition may occur among herbaceous-layer species, particularly at high productivity, competitive exclusion remains low. This may be because the traits that permit survival under tree canopy shading reduce the effects of light competition with other understory species, or because understory productivity is not high enough to induce intense light competition among herbaceous-layer species.
ISSN:1095-5674
1940-0616
DOI:10.2307/4126926