A Validated Method for Identifying Unplanned Pediatric Readmission

Objective To validate the accuracy of pre-encounter hospital designation as a novel way to identify unplanned pediatric readmissions and describe the most common diagnoses for unplanned readmissions among children. Study design We examined all hospital discharges from 2 tertiary care children's...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of pediatrics 2016-03, Vol.170, p.105-112.e2
Main Authors: Auger, Katherine A., MD, MSc, Mueller, Emily L., MD, MSc, Weinberg, Steven H, Forster, Catherine S., MD, Shah, Anita, MD, Wolski, Christine, MD, Mussman, Grant, MD, Ipsaro, Anna J., MD, MBE, Davis, Matthew M., MD, MAPP
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Hospitals, Pediatric - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Infant
Male
Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data
Patient Readmission
Pediatrics
Risk Factors
Tertiary Care Centers - statistics & numerical data
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To validate the accuracy of pre-encounter hospital designation as a novel way to identify unplanned pediatric readmissions and describe the most common diagnoses for unplanned readmissions among children. Study design We examined all hospital discharges from 2 tertiary care children's hospitals excluding deaths, normal newborn discharges, transfers to other institutions, and discharges to hospice. We performed blinded medical record review on 641 randomly selected readmissions to validate the pre-encounter planned/unplanned hospital designation. We identified the most common discharge diagnoses associated with subsequent 30-day unplanned readmissions. Results Among 166 994 discharges (hospital A: n = 55 383; hospital B: n = 111 611), the 30-day unplanned readmission rate was 10.3% (hospital A) and 8.7% (hospital B). The hospital designation of “unplanned” was correct in 98% (hospital A) and 96% (hospital B) of readmissions; the designation of “planned” was correct in 86% (hospital A) and 85% (hospital B) of readmissions. The most common discharge diagnoses for which unplanned 30-day readmissions occurred were oncologic conditions (up to 38%) and nonhypertensive congestive heart failure (about 25%), across both institutions. Conclusions Unplanned readmission rates for pediatrics, using a validated, accurate, pre-encounter designation of “unplanned,” are higher than previously estimated. For some pediatric conditions, unplanned readmission rates are as high as readmission rates reported for adult conditions. Anticipating unplanned readmissions for high-frequency diagnostic groups may help focus efforts to reduce the burden of readmission for families and facilities. Using timing of hospital registration in administrative records is an accurate, widely available, real-time way to distinguish unplanned vs planned pediatric readmissions.
ISSN:0022-3476
1097-6833
DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.11.051